Debate Competition Summary

Debate competition summary essay (generally 7 articles)

Debate competition, as a language art, has a long history, and its role is self-evident. Below are the sample debate summary essays I collected and compiled. Welcome to read them.

Debate Contest Summary 1

Promote the spirit of the rule of law, enhance students’ legal concepts, improve students’ critical thinking, logical thinking and oral expression skills, and enrich campus cultural life. Planned by the Ideological and Political Teaching and Research Office The "Life and Law Debate" debate competition hosted by the university officially started in early December.

1. Overview of the Debate Competition

This debate competition was participated by eight debate teams and 32 students from nine classes of freshmen in our college (excluding the class of outstanding athletes) . The debate lasted for two weeks and was divided into two stages: the preliminaries on December x and the finals on December x. In the end, one champion team, one runner-up team, two third-place teams, two best debaters, and outstanding debaters were determined. Nine hands. As the first debate held by the college, the event was well received by students, which greatly stimulated their enthusiasm for participation. It achieved a great degree of success and had a wide impact on the majority of students. It was also popular among all the students in the college. The leaders paid great attention to it.

The content of the debate topics in this debate reflects the characteristics of popularization and civilianization. The debate topics are all legal issues that are closely related to the lives of ordinary people or of great concern to ordinary people. The event adopts the method of drawing lots to determine the opponents, debate topics and times. The judges for this event are teachers from the Ideological and Political Teaching and Research Office and the Liberal Arts Teaching and Research Office of the Ministry of Public Security.

During the competition, the debaters exchanged words and tit-for-tat, which reflected the debaters' sufficient preparation before the competition, their relatively superb debate strategies and their rebuttal abilities. The wonderful arguments on the court won bursts of warm applause from the students off the court. The judges judged the rights and wrongs of the team's debate based on my country's current laws and explained the legal principles. They also evaluated the overall performance of each team and the debaters in the debate. Their wonderful comments also added to the icing on the cake of this debate. .

2. The results of the debate

(1) The comprehensive ability of the contestants has been improved. The debate competition is a comprehensive examination of the debaters' ability and level. In the process of debating, if debaters want to conquer and defeat their opponents in a heated debate, they need to possess a wide range of knowledge and abilities. For this purpose, they fully demonstrate themselves on the stage, and their abilities are also Improve unconsciously. First, thinking skills are improved. Secondly, language expression is more artistic. Third, the knowledge structure is more complete. Fourth, adaptability is enhanced. Fifth, courage is exercised.

(2) A vivid law class was given to the students, and the students’ overall discrimination ability was enhanced, and the campus cultural level was overall improved. As the saying goes, "the truth becomes clearer the more you debate it," and the debate is focused on issues that students care about. The themes of the debate competition are very close to the lives of the students and are highly realistic, giving the students something to say. Both parties in the debate tried their best to analyze the problem comprehensively and deeply, showing both sides of the matter to all the students, while the audience started thinking intensely in the conflict of ideas, and finally understood the essence of the problem, learned to analyze the problem, and improved their ability to distinguish. , laying the foundation for subsequent effective actions. The strong debate atmosphere has also improved the overall cultural level of the school. Students can discuss more elegant topics, learn to persuade others with reason, and will not be irritable with others, nor will they be aggressive, making them much more civilized.

(3) Enhanced class cohesion. Debate is not only a display of individual talent, but an excellent team cannot stand out without the tacit understanding of the small group of four people, and it cannot do without the support of the large group - the classmates. Before the game, the squad leader and study committee actively and orderly organized the whole class to divide the work to find information. During the game, they cheered for the players, applauded and cheered for them, and shared the joy of victory and the pain of defeat after the game. The competition brought them closer and made them more like a family.

(4) Increase the teacher’s understanding of the students.

This event mainly invited leading guests and teachers. During the debate, the teachers gained a deeper understanding of the students ideologically.

3. Things worth thinking about

Overall, the debate has achieved good results. However, due to the hasty preparation of this event and the relative lack of experience in hosting the event, the entire organization process There were also some minor problems, such as insufficient auxiliary facilities, relatively insufficient pre-game guidance for students, and a lack of order in the awards ceremony. To this end, we will take effective measures to correct the deficiencies in our future work and make the debate more successful. Debate Competition Summary Part 2

At 18:30 on October 30, 20xx, a friendly debate competition between the Information Branch and the Finance and Taxation Branch was held in J1-101 of our school. We are honored to have senior students as judges for this debate competition. The information branch team composed of affirmative debaters and the finance and taxation branch composed of negative debaters had a heated debate on the topic "Which is more important, picking up or putting down".

The competition*** is divided into six links. The competition venue became tense and intense from the moment the chairman called for it to begin. The debaters from both sides were tit-for-tat, quarreling, and going back and forth without losing their grace and talking eloquently. Especially in the most exciting free debate session, the atmosphere quickly heated up and the applause continued. At the end, the judges’ on-site comments also benefited everyone present, especially the debaters, especially the sentence “The test of debate is whether the argument is grounded and logical. The real winner is not whose argument is impeccable. , but who can convince the other party better." In the end, the competition ended with the negative side winning, and the judges said that the positive side with murderous eyes was awarded the honorary title of the best debater.

This branch friendly debate not only exercised the contestants’ debating and cooperation skills, improved their thinking reaction speed, communication skills, enhanced their language organization ability and adaptability, but also promoted inter-branch communication. The communication strengthened the friendship and showed the elegance of the students from the Information Branch and the Finance and Taxation Branch. Debate Competition Summary Part 3

In order to enrich the extracurricular life of college students, activate campus culture, cultivate the unity, competition and enterprising qualities of contemporary college students, improve their eloquence and communication skills, and reflect the spiritual outlook of contemporary college students. The Soaring Eagle Motivational Association sent a capable team to participate in the debate competition held by the "Xiaoxi Debate Speech Association". In the end, it achieved excellent results. The debate competition is summarized as follows:

1 , activity method

This activity is open to the whole school. Students can participate in this debate competition in the name of clubs, colleges, classes, individuals, etc. This debate uses a elimination system to select the teams with the best results to advance to the next round. This method will continue until four teams are selected to enter the finals. Unfortunately, the Soaring Eagle Inspirational Association was eliminated in the semi-finals and missed the finals.

2. Event time:

October 19 to November 15, 20XX

3. Event location:

Preliminary round : Variety C102, Variety C106, Variety C104

Semi-finals: Variety C102, Variety C106

Final: Yixinlou

4. Participants:

Teachers and students of the school

5. Debate procedure

The competition procedure consists of five parts: speech, argumentation, summary of attack and defense, free debate, and concluding speech*** , first of all, the first and second debates are used to make the opening arguments, using the most concise language to explain the basic position, logical framework, theoretical basis, factual materials, etc., followed by tit-for-tat attacks and defenses and exciting free debates, and then The four debates will be followed by concluding remarks, followed by questions from the audience. The competition program is mainly divided into two aspects: "debating" and "argumentation". It not only provides sufficient space for both sides of the debate to make wonderful arguments and fully demonstrate their rigorous logical framework, but also provides a stage for both sides to engage in head-to-head confrontation. The audience can ask questions. On the one hand, the stage can mobilize the enthusiasm of the audience, on the other hand, it also enhances the interaction between the debate and the audience, making the atmosphere more active.

6. Activity results:

The expected results were achieved, the event was carried out smoothly and was a complete success.

7. Thoughts on the event

In the debate, the debaters of the association fought against the teams with their quick thinking and eloquent eloquence. In the end, they successfully entered the semi-finals. Although , was eliminated in the semi-finals and missed the championship. However, the performance of the debaters was still very good, showing the style of the new generation of college students, and they also got exercise. We must understand that there is not only this debate competition in life, but there will be many debate competitions in the future. , I believe they will perform better and better in the future. Debate Competition Summary 4

Smart eloquence and quick thinking skills are two major talents that contemporary college students must possess when they leave school. In order to train and improve the eloquence and thinking skills of our students, we also provide The students provide a stage to show their own style and cooperate with the Youth League Committee of the college to organize the first group cultural festival. Chenjiang Forum specially organized this campus debate competition in conjunction with the Life Sciences Association. After more than 40 days of intense and careful planning and organization by the debate organizing committee composed of the Chenjiang Forum and the Life Sciences Association, the campus debate finally came to an end amidst the praise and applause of the students. Four students from the Chinese Department The Weeping Willow team composed of famous contestants stood out and won the championship of this campus debate competition. This debate has a special meaning compared to the past:

First, it is an important part of the first group cultural festival. It is under the direct leadership of the Youth League Committee of the hospital, making the event more cohesive;

Second, this is the first debate competition jointly organized by Chenjiang Forum and another fraternal organization (Life Science Association) since its establishment. It reflects the new image and spiritual outlook of our group. The successful holding of this debate competition also This shows that the student groups of our college have strong vitality;

Third, after the competition, a group of outstanding debaters stood out, which made good preparations for the selection of debaters for our group debate team. It should be said that this competition was quite successful. As the direct organizer and planner of this competition, our group secretariat now briefly summarizes the competition as follows:

1. Debate topic

The debate topics in this competition cover a wide range of content, but they are also closely related to daily life, and have both the taste of life and the flavor of the times, allowing the debaters to have something good to say during the debate. This debate topic involves current affairs issues, campus issues, kindness and good deeds, and environmental protection issues. On the one hand, the daily life of the debate topic gives the majority of students space to think. On the other hand, the debate topic closely follows the needs of the development of the times. It has a strong sense of the times. This makes the whole debate scene exciting, lively and beautiful, and it can arouse people's thinking after the game, giving people an intriguing and profound meaning. It can be said that the precise setting of debate topics laid a good foundation for the success of this debate. However, the breadth of the content of the debate and the strong sense of the times also require debaters to have profound knowledge accumulation and extensive social contacts.

2. Debate procedures

The format of this competition basically follows the Singapore model, but some adjustments have been made to the procedures based on the actual situation. Due to time constraints, the speaking time for certain procedures has been appropriately reduced, making the entire debate more compact and making the competition more interesting. The competition program consists of six parts: coach's statement, argumentation, attack and defense, free debate, concluding statement, and audience questions. First, the first and second debates are the opening arguments, using the most concise language to explain the basic position, logical framework, theoretical basis, factual materials, etc., followed by tit-for-tat attacks and defenses and exciting free debates, and then the four The debate will conclude with a final statement, and the audience will ask questions at the end. The setting of the competition program takes into account both the "debating" and "argumentation" aspects. It not only provides sufficient space for both sides of the debate to make wonderful arguments and fully demonstrate their meticulous logical framework, but also provides both sides with an opportunity to engage in verbal battles and head-on confrontations. stage. The audience question stage can not only mobilize the enthusiasm of the audience, but also enhance the interaction between the debaters and the audience.

However, some problems were also exposed during the competition. During the attack and defense stage, many debaters did not know much about the rules of attack and defense, which caused considerable confusion. The setting of attack and defense questions was not clever enough, making the entire attack and defense stage a bit dull. Not exciting enough. During the free debate, both sides of the question and answer were not specific enough. From time to time, each had his or her own opinions, and there were not many exciting exchanges. A special point to mention is that during this competition, because another group participating in hosting this event did not have enough experience in the debate competition, the students it sent as judges directly took away the scoring sheets and left without going through the unified scoring. The results were not announced on the spot during the competition. Such a phenomenon will never be allowed to occur in future competitions.

3. Debate style and level

This debate competition attaches great importance to the issue of debate style. Generally speaking, the debate style of the participating team members is quite good. In addition to paying attention to the beauty of language, you also pay full attention to your own image and demeanor, so that the audience can feast their eyes and ears. Some debaters were eloquent and well-spoken, some were calm and steady, with the demeanor of generals, and some debaters were smart and lively, and could laugh and curse well, which was an eye-opener for the audience and judges. However, there are also some problems. Some debaters did not pay attention to respecting each other, and even slightly suspected of personally attacking each other. We will attach great importance to this aspect in the future. This competition fully demonstrated the debaters' agility and meticulous logical thinking. Both in the argumentation and rebuttal stages, there were climaxes one after another, which was very exciting. Generally speaking, this debate has the tenseness of "debate" but also the vigorous momentum of "argument".

In the debate arena, there are often some unexpected views, exaggerated and personalized language, quotations from scriptures, and witty sayings. They are both masculine and feminine, making the audience deeply moved. Feel the debater's erudition and wit.

4. The atmosphere and audience reaction

Another highlight of this debate is the audience. The audience was extremely lively and gave warm applause from time to time. During the audience question stage, some questions were quite typical and targeted, and some audience members were quite debater-like when asking questions. The questions also covered various aspects. The scene was very lively, making the atmosphere tense and interesting. It also raised some issues that were of great social value and worth thinking about, and had a certain degree of reality. It also pointed out issues that the debaters on both sides did not pay attention to, making the discussion of the debate topics more profound.

5. Thoughts after the game

A debate brings us not only the result of the game, but more importantly, the debaters formed an inseparable bond in the process of organizing the competition. The fighting group embodies the spirit of division of labor and cooperation. Yin Jiangli, a student from Class 1, Class 2004, Department of Chinese Language and Literature, said after the game: "Through debate, I learned to cooperate, and also learned to be calm and calm." This sentence expressed the sentiments of all the debaters. Someone once said that debate is the gymnastics of wisdom. Indeed, the fierce intellectual confrontation and spiritual collision of ideas in debate can allow us to appreciate the beauty of wisdom. A debate is not a simple battle of words, but a battle of cultural heritage, personality beauty and wisdom. First of all, it requires debaters to have a profound cultural heritage and a rich theoretical foundation, which means they must be knowledgeable. Secondly, you must have a sensitive response, a good attitude and a charming personality. Debaters must have an elegant debating style, be gentle and courteous, and convince people with reason rather than arguing with words. During the debate, the debaters also learned how to respect their opponents and how to pay attention to their own words and deeds, giving people a sense of magnanimity. The situation in the debate arena changes rapidly, which also requires debaters to be adaptable. Some debaters perform quite well in this regard. They can make full use of their debating skills and their own wisdom, and are very polite to their debate partners. This is what we should promote and learn from. In the future, we will also strengthen debaters in this aspect. Training to achieve a qualitative leap.

Although the competition is over, it has indeed brought us a lot. There may be regrets and failures in the debate, but it just allows us to learn the style of "debating". There are also some problems in this competition, such as the debate style and logical framework during the competition. We should rationally analyze and summarize, correct the deficiencies in the process, and continuously improve. This debate also received strong support from the Youth League Committee, Group Federation, tutors, and judges of the college. They also contributed a lot to the smooth progress and success of this competition. They also contributed a lot.

In short, we will carefully analyze and summarize this competition, learn from experience, and strive to use our strengths and avoid weaknesses in other aspects of work in the future, accumulate experience, improve shortcomings, and reach a higher level. Debate Contest Summary Chapter 5

On the evening of November 13th to 14th, 20xx, the School of Information Engineering Rainbow Station successfully held the School of Information Engineering's "Gathering of Elites, Tit for Tat" in Classrooms 1203 and 1205 of Mingyuan, Weishui Campus Qingma Debate Competition preliminary round. All members of the Qingma Class of the School of Information Engineering and members of all 14th grade classes *** also participated. Wang Miao, Secretary General of the Youth League Committee of the School of Information Engineering, Fu Xiankai, Chairman of the Student Union of the School of Information Engineering, Lei Shengqiang, Vice Chairman of the Student Union of the School of Information Engineering, Wang Huaizheng, chairman of the Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Association of the School of Information Engineering, and Zhou Yucheng, vice chairman of the Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Association of the School of Information Engineering, served as the judges of this debate.

The competition kicked off with the opening remarks of the two hosts and the warm applause of the audience. The competition is divided into two parts. A total of 14 teams participated in the competition. The competition is divided into five stages: argument stage, refutation stage, questioning stage, free debate, and summary statement. The pros and cons compete in pairs, with four debaters each responding. During the competition stage, the atmosphere was tense and fierce. The debaters from both sides cited classics and connected ancient and modern times to fully demonstrate their debate points. During the free debate stage, the competition became intense. The debaters from both sides seized on each other's loopholes, faced each other tit for tat, and pressed forward step by step, pushing the atmosphere to a climax again. The debaters gave a wonderful debate on the stage, and the audience burst into applause. After the first and second half of the debate, the judges present made wonderful comments.

Competition*** Eight teams were promoted to participate in the semi-finals.

This debate has cultivated students' teamwork skills, improved their critical thinking and expression skills, and also strengthened the academic atmosphere of the college. At this point, the debate has come to an end and subsequent competitions are being prepared in an orderly manner. Debate Competition Summary Part 6

1. Activity Background

In order to welcome the Hebei Universiade next year, it will be held at Xingtai College to provide a platform for eight clubs to practice their eloquence.

2. Theme of the event

Unite the eight societies to jointly practice eloquence and create an auditory feast of debate.

3. Preparation before the event

1. Our activities department has formulated a detailed and feasible competition plan for the preliminary round, semi-finals and finals.

2. The activities department subdivides various tasks to each officer, and each officer prepares every step before the game seriously and responsibly. *** will also improve the debate competition affairs.

3. Our department coordinates various societies and the publicity department of the society. The network department does a good job in publicity work, and the officers do a good job in setting up the venue and getting the equipment in place.

4. All clubs actively participate in registration, and the Propaganda Department will vigorously promote the competition.

4. Activity process

1. Preliminary round: November 22, location: Classroom 204.206.208.210, Public *** Teaching Building. After fierce and cruel competition, four teams stood out among the eight participating teams and presented a wonderful debate and confrontation to everyone.

2. Rematch: November 25th. Location: Public School Building 210. The four teams came forward to start a more exciting debate, which was more mature and intense than the first time. At the same time, the applause of the audience became more intense, and the debaters were all as passionate as warriors fighting on the battlefield.

In the end, under the professional comments of the judges of each club, the Xianghuo combination and the Hunter combination finally broke through and entered the finals.

3. Finals. November 29th, location: Room 310, Public Education Building. The two teams entering the finals were ready to compete, and the field was crowded with people. The showdown between masters and masters pushed this competition to a climax, truly creating an unprecedented debate battle. Each contestant confidently and passionately attacked and refuted the opponent. Especially in the most exciting free debate stage, the debate was performed Extreme. There was constant applause from the audience. Finally, under the careful and fair evaluation of the judges, the positive team Xianghuo defeated the negative team. The final game came to a successful conclusion.

5. Problems existing in the event

1. The publicity for the debate was not strong enough. Many people missed the registration because they did not understand the relevant rules of the debate.

2. In the preliminary round, most contestants did not pay enough attention and were not fully prepared. They failed to state their opinions without writing, which directly reduced the excitement of the competition.

3. The preliminary competition publicity notice was not in place, resulting in an unsatisfactory number of spectators.

4. The contestants did not know the rules of the debate very well, which resulted in chaos at the beginning of the preliminary round. Debate Competition Summary Part 7

In order to deepen computer major students’ understanding of computer-related knowledge, and encourage students to consider professional knowledge and knowledge in the computer field from different perspectives. On the afternoon of April 24, 2016, the Computer Technology Innovation Club successfully held the Computer Culture Festival Debate Competition at 5A404. The debate competition focused on two debate topics related to the computer major, with pros and cons debated by teachers Tong Changfei and Zhao Hanli. Judges.

At 14:00 sharp in the afternoon, the debate officially began. The debates were based on the topics of "Can artificial intelligence surpass humans" and "Which one has more development prospects, ios or Android". During the debate The pros and cons argued vigorously, each using strong arguments to prove their point of view. Both sides refused to give in to each other, especially the free debate session which was even more exciting. After the debate on each topic, the judges and Teacher Zhao will make meaningful comments, point out the advantages and disadvantages, express their own views on the topic, and provide guidance on how to approach the topic.

After the tense debate, the staff of the Computer Technology Innovation Club counted the teachers’ scores and selected the popularity award, debater, and debate group respectively. The two teachers who were present at the scene took a group photo with the award-winning classmates. As a souvenir, with a round of applause, the debate officially ended.

This competition enriches the extracurricular life of students majoring in computer-related fields, broadens their horizons in the computer field, improves their critical thinking ability, exercises their eloquence, cultivates their adaptability, and at the same time allows them to The students realized that they need to consider related software and hardware products in the computer field from different perspectives and improve their sensitivity to the development prospects of computers.

The Computer Technology Innovation Club held the Computer Culture Festival Debate Competition this time to encourage students to actively understand the knowledge in the computer field, encourage students to innovate in computer technology, and increase the activity of computer-related majors in our school Spend. ;