It is suggested that the government should be responsible for eliminating stray cats and dogs nationwide. what do you think?

Compared with people who love cats and dogs, they love cats and dogs because of love. But why do stray cats and dogs appear because they love cats and dogs? You don't face it, and what you say is not necessarily true. It's pitiful that others eat dog meat as dog lovers. Why are those stray cats and dogs in the streets unattended? As a pet lover, what do you think? Everyone's mood is understandable. Why do those stray cats and dogs need the government to take the lead in removing them? How to clear it? Why should the so-called capital be borne by the government? Loving pets is a personal choice, but only if you are responsible for your choice.

People who like to keep pets should keep them to the end. Whether it is a sick cat or a sick dog, it is their choice, even if it is life or death. Since you like and love it, people who like to keep pets will be responsible for it to the end. If you like it but can't afford it, don't choose to buy and sell adoption. It is an individual's behavior to love pets or not. But relatively speaking, a large number of stray dogs and cats in the city are neglected, which destroys the urban environment. Because a large number of stray dogs and cats defecate at will, it destroys the air and pollutes the environment. However, isn't all this an act of loving pets? As for the pollution of urban environment, compared with countries or regions that love pets, some policies have been introduced to register people and families who like pets.

Stray cats and dogs come from people who like keeping pets. However, why do stray cats or dogs appear in the streets of society and have to be paid by the government? Keep it if you can. If you don't have the ability, why must you avoid the strong and be strong? Is it abandoned or chosen, or is it a mental retardation of human nature? Or animal pity? Relatively speaking, what is the relationship between eating dog meat and dog lovers? Since you like keeping pets, you can selectively organize a group that loves pets and invite more people and money to solve the problem of stray cats and dogs. If you can't even do the basic common sense of loving pets, is all this just? Theoretically? That's all!

If there are a large number of stray dogs in the city, if diners are allowed to catch them, why should the government invest to solve this problem? If all stray dogs and cats in the country need government funds to solve the problem, can the government become a place to collect stray dogs and cats? There are tens of millions of stray dogs and cats in China. These abandoned animals are the result of government inaction? Or is it the fault of pet lovers? If a large number of stray dogs and cats appear and pet lovers abandon their pets, in fact, as a choice or possibility of national and regional governments, a large number of stray dogs and cats are executed, and most of them are not adopted. Euthanasia? Died of vaccination. People who love pets are their own choices, and eating dog meat is someone else's business.

The above is a reasoning judgment. In order to protect the urban environment and reduce the appearance of stray cats and dogs, a large number of pets are strictly controlled when cats and dogs are inedible. The city has made relevant regulations on keeping pets. All pets must be registered, and there are clear regulations on how to deal with dogs and cats who give up halfway, how to keep pets in a civilized way, and how to punish irresponsible householders or individuals.