Joke Collection Website - Bulletin headlines - Zheng Siqun came to do what he wanted.

Zheng Siqun came to do what he wanted.

1966 In the summer, an evil wind with a ghost fire spread from the north to Chongqing and invaded Chongqing University, a southwest institution of higher learning. The open campus with more than 10,000 teachers and students suddenly became a typhoon. Chongqing that summer was exciting.

On May 4th, Zheng Siqun, Party Secretary and President of Chongqing University, made a mobilization report criticizing the "Three Villages", and then criticized Wu Han and his works Hai Rui dismissed from office and Deng Tuo of People's Daily by name. As a prelude to the Cultural Revolution, people aroused by political passion posted posters everywhere in school buildings and student dormitories. In late May, the Party Committee of the school conveyed the notice of the Central Committee on May 16, which was a programmatic document to launch the "Cultural Revolution", demanding "holding high the banner of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, thoroughly exposing the so-called' academic authority' reactionary bourgeois stance against the Party and socialism, thoroughly criticizing the reactionary bourgeois ideas in academia, education, press and publication, and seizing the leadership in the cultural field."

The notice is "clear-cut". All kinds of "capitalist roaders" and "reactionary academic authorities" in Zheng Siqun's school, department and office are in danger. The posters exposing and criticizing them are overwhelming, and the world of the university is in chaos.

On June 1 day, china national radio broadcasted a poster written by Peking University and Nie attacking the party committee of the school. On the same day, People's Daily published an editorial entitled "Sweep away all ghosts and ghosts". People's Daily published a commentator's article entitled "Cheer for a poster of Peking University" on the posters of Nie and others, and published the decision of the New Beijing Municipal Committee to reorganize the Party Committee of Peking University and send a working group of the Municipal Committee to lead the "Cultural Revolution". This rapid political shock wave has a great impact on Chongqing University and has a strong response.

The teachers, students and employees have been talking about it, and the posters have turned to schools and started to point to party committees and leading cadres at all levels. On June 4th, the school party committee held an enlarged meeting. Liu Yuyuan, deputy secretary of the school, conveyed the urgent instructions of the provincial and municipal party committees, demanding to keep up with the situation, break the old rules, mobilize the masses freely, sweep away demons and ghosts, and immediately set off a new campaign climax. He also said that the municipal party Committee instructed that if the leadership of the party Committee is weak, a working group will be sent to the school immediately.

Faced with great pressure, the enlarged meeting of the Party Committee decided to suspend classes for three days, focusing on sports and setting off a climax. That night, the whole school meeting was held immediately to support and support the decision of the Beijing Municipal Committee to reorganize the Peking University Party Committee and the posters of Nie and others. The school party committee should not only try to adapt to the situation and the requirements of the higher authorities, but also try to master the movement and limit the movement to sweeping only a few "ghosts" so as not to cause confusion. However, this contradicts the movement leaders' intention to fully mobilize the masses and seize the rights of the "capitalist roaders", so they can never adapt to the situation and get rid of passivity.

On June 8, the working group of Chongqing Municipal Committee entered a university. Although they took the lead in affirming that Zheng Siqun's old revolution encountered new problems, and that "it is not Peking University that matters, but the mainstream of major party committees is good", they successively stressed: "Don't frame the exposure problems, anyone's problems can be exposed." For a time, among cadres and the masses, between teachers and students, and between faculty and staff, the criticism of each other with posters intensified, and more than 70 people were named at one time.