Digital economy is an important symbol of high-quality development in the new era.

From the practice of urban economic transformation to enterprise value reengineering, digital economy has become an important symbol of high-quality development in the new era. We should re-examine the position of digital economy in economic and social development and take the contribution rate of digital economy as the main index to measure high-quality development. It is necessary to speed up the research and formulation of a scientific, feasible, universal, collectable and evaluable statistical accounting standard system for the full-caliber added value of the digital economy. It is necessary to establish and improve the institutional system, policy system and cadre assessment system based on the main strategy of digital economy. This issue is of great significance and directly related to the baton of economic development.

Digital industrialization and industrial digitalization are important supports for the integrated development of digital economy and real economy. The core of digital industrialization is technology, and the core of industrial digitalization is application. In other words, the core of the integration of digital economy and real economy is the integration of technology and application. To achieve the integration of the two, the most important thing is to solve three drivers, namely data-driven, algorithm-driven and scene-driven. The key to these three drivers is to achieve three breakthroughs: first, the innovation breakthrough of key technologies; The second is the institutional breakthrough of technology transformation; The third is the breakthrough of the application scenario ecosystem. Without the breakthrough of these three conditions, integration is impossible. From the perspective of development mode, the core of these three breakthroughs is digital transformation and the essence is market-oriented reform.

To promote the deep integration of digital economy and real economy, the most fundamental thing lies in the interconnection of platforms and the open sharing of data. To realize data openness, platform openness is the foundation, data confirmation is the key, and legal supervision is the guarantee. We often say three sentences: the first sentence is to assign a value to the data and let the value of the data be released; The second sentence is to empower data and let data elements flow; The third sentence is to empower data and make data property rights clear. As a new factor of production and a new mechanism that can participate in distribution with data contribution rate, data ownership must be clarified first, and then the legal norms of data rights, data utilization and data protection can be determined. This is a weak link in the integration and development of digital economy and real economy, and it is also a major theoretical issue facing the digital economy itself. If data ownership and data rights are not clear and standardized, data utilization and data protection are out of the question, let alone the integrated development of digital economy and real economy.

Here, I will focus on the confirmation of data, which mainly involves three aspects: first, what rights does the data have; The second is how to confirm the right; The third is how to break through data confirmation in law and practice. Whether data is a right or a right is not clearly defined in legislation. Theoretically or academically, data should be a right, and the dispute over data is essentially a dispute over rights. Without the right to talk about data, the subject is missing. Our research holds that there are three forms of data rights: one is data rights, the other is * * * enjoyment rights, and the third is data sovereignty, which we call digital rights. Several rights are different from real rights, which are often manifested as "one number of rights", and * * * enjoying rights is the essence of several rights.

How to define data ownership is a very complicated problem. Because digital rights have both private rights, public rights and technical attributes. Some data is commercial and some data is public. There are also some data, ownership and use rights can be completely separated and so on. During the 20021two sessions, I put forward a proposal on further revising and perfecting the data security law and the personal information protection law. In the reply to my proposal, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) Law Committee also mentioned that how to further define data ownership on the basis of existing laws in theory and practice needs further exploration and practice. These replies further illustrate the difficulty of data confirmation, and once again confirm the value and significance of our research.

(Lian is a member of Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and the president of Beijing International Urban Development Research Institute)