The opening song of "Anti-Gangster" was suspected of copyright infringement, and then the raw material seller Gao Mou appeared

After looking at these years, it can be said that infringement and plagiarism incidents have occurred frequently. The recently popular TV series "Anti-Gangster" is also suspected of plagiarism. Is this really the case? Or a lie? Go ahead.

Recently, Mr. Wang from Anqing, Anhui Province reported that at the beginning of the "anti-crime storm", there were two pictures that were taken by him as a time-lapse photography material.

After this incident, Zhang Qunfeng, the post-production team of "Sweeping Crime Storm", replied that the title sequence was produced by Yihe Culture. If there is any infringement, please negotiate with Mr. Wang of Yihe Culture to resolve the matter.

Afterwards, Yihe Culture immediately responded and issued a statement. It was noted that Open was purchasing unauthorized material from one of the company's websites, but the website has been contacted after being challenged by the claimant of the original material.

A netizen said: "Is such a big film company the same as the website where I buy materials?"

After the "Voice of Culture", the photographer who claimed infringement also said No videos were uploaded, no materials were sold, and relevant videos were made public for comparison.

At this time, netizens were also divided into two groups. Because a school supports the original author, I think it is the responsibility of the team. Wasn’t the TV series deceived?

The other group believes that "this is a problem with the material website. The TV series is just being deceived and has nothing to do with TV series and movies."

Afterwards, VJshi, the material website involved, finally issued an apology statement. After confirming the facts, it was published that the contributor Gao Moumou provided works other than original ones. I have blocked the account and suspended cooperation. It is said that I am a victim myself.

So far, the question points to this point, but the incident of kicking the ball has come to an end.

In the early morning of September 3, Yihe Culture forwarded VJshi’s statement. com, said that while assisting in resolving infringement issues, it will pursue relevant legal responsibilities and formally apologize for the "anti-gang storm".

I thought the incident would have come to an end here, but this morning, a photographer who claimed infringement spoke out. There has been no effective communication so far. We strongly demand an immediate stop to the infringement and an apology.

In fact, we had been arguing for a long time and everyone made a statement. Although playing football with each other has nothing to do with me, no one communicates with the original author. I discussed how to handle the incident.

But some netizens said, "Shouldn't the original author go to Gao? Does it have anything to do with other people?"

Reasonable netizens said: "The TV series does use people's The work also involves the issue of infringement. Is it just a process? It cannot be a reason to shirk responsibility."

But, to be honest, regardless of who is responsible for the copyright infringement, the TV series of the title does use this material. Since infringement has been constituted, whether it is re-editing, changing the title or other processing methods, you should communicate with the original author in detail to find a solution.

It is not a good idea to make statements like this to each other to shirk responsibility.

In fact, the occurrence of this incident also gave designers a warning that the materials purchased on the material website may have problems. We also hope that future material users will pay more attention to the qualifications and strength of the material website when purchasing materials, and conduct more stringent reviews of the correct source of content and the legality of authorization.

However, some websites sell them without the authorization of the original author, and some even sell pirated resources. Nowadays, society pays more and more attention to intellectual property rights, and we also hope that this unhealthy trend can be changed.