Is Taoism patriotic?

This is why the saint travels all day long without leaving his luggage. Although there is a view of glory, Yan is aloof.

General wisdom thinks that Taoists are free from the world or act according to the times, but this sentence shows: Those who want to learn the way of saints should be able to shoulder all the burdens of pain for the world and all living beings. The wish cannot be lost in one day from this sense of responsibility. This is the original meaning of "a saint walks all day long without leaving his luggage". "Walking all day long without leaving one's baggage" means that people who aspire to be saints should always be cautious of fear and have a sense of responsibility to save the world and save people anytime and anywhere. If a truly virtuous person reaches this status, even though he is in the "view of glory", he will still be indifferent and nihilistic, and will not change his original simplicity; even though he is in glory and wealth, he will still be aloof and unworthy of merit. Becoming famous, rich, and glorious, but exhausting one's heart, this is the way for a virtuous person to live his life. The word "guan" in "Rong Guan" here is a broken pronunciation. It should be read as the word "guan" for ancient buildings, not the word "guan" for viewing. The word "Yan", commonly known as "Yan", means quiet.

This is "the way to annihilate countless and boundless sentient beings, and in fact no sentient beings are annihilated." The true inaction, doing without doing, doing without doing, the mind is not contaminated. Do it with enthusiasm on the surface but as if nothing has happened in your heart. Inaction does not mean passively withdrawing from the world and not doing anything; nor does it mean simply following the laws of nature and acting accordingly. Confucius, a sage, "does what cannot be done". On the surface, it seems to be "doing something". This is really a misinterpretation of the original intention of the saint. The Diamond Sutra also mentions that "all sages regard non-action as the Dharma, and there are differences." Although saints have different degrees of sainthood, they all forget about things and themselves, and are unfazed by favors and disgrace, which is what the Diamond Sutra says. It is said that "there is no self-image, no human being, all living beings, and longevity." In my opinion, Jesus is also a Bodhisattva. Although his sermons and teachings are different from ours, he still teaches according to circumstances and preaches as the opportunity arises (according to the root causes and conditions of Westerners: at that time, the West had that level of environment and civilization, and could not accept higher and deeper teachings. (principle), that is, "follow what all sentient beings should know and understand"; finally, take the initiative to sacrifice one's life for righteousness and atone for the sins of all sentient beings. It seems that Jesus Christ is also the saint who broke the "dual opposition" because he knew that all living beings are one, otherwise how could he be willing to give up his body; if all living beings are not one, how can all living beings benefit from Jesus' atonement? Therefore, the fundamental criterion for judging the inaction of a true saint is the "heart and ground"!

"Although there is a view of glory" when glory and wealth come, it is also "detached" and treats it with a normal heart.

Mencius said: Wherever the Tao is, even if there are thousands of people, I will go there!