Does the lawsuit of "parking service, car damage at your own risk" comply with the law?

The regulation of "parking service, paying for the car" has no legal effect.

This clause is a standard clause, which excludes the rights of consumers and exempts the operators from their responsibilities. This standard clause is invalid. If the parking service suffers losses, it shall be liable for compensation according to law.

Article 26 of the Law on the Protection of Consumers' Rights and Interests, when using standard clauses in business activities, business operators shall draw consumers' attention to matters related to consumers' major interests, such as quantity and quality, price or expense, time limit and method of performance, safety precautions, risk warning, after-sales service, civil liability, etc., in a conspicuous way, and explain them according to consumers' requirements.

Operators shall not make unfair and unreasonable provisions to consumers, such as excluding or restricting consumers' rights, reducing or exempting operators' responsibilities, and aggravating consumers' responsibilities, by means of format clauses, notices, statements, shop notices, etc. , and shall not use format terms and use technical means to force transactions.

Format terms, notices, statements, shop notices, etc. If it contains the contents listed in the preceding paragraph, its contents are invalid.