How to treat smoking ban measures

Question 1: What do you think of the measures to ban smoking? As a signatory to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, China promised to ban smoking in public places from June 5th to1October 9th.

The state promised 20 1 1 to ban smoking in public places, but it failed to be realized. Some places have publicly stated that China has failed to ban smoking. For this phenomenon, I think we should look at it comprehensively:

On the one hand, the starting point of * * * is to better safeguard public health, protect people's health, reduce the harm of second-hand smoke to people's health, and build a more environmentally friendly and green living environment.

On the other hand, the implementation effect of this smoking ban is not obvious. I think this is also due to deep-seated reasons, mainly reflected in two aspects: First, the lack of tobacco control means. Exquisite tobacco packaging, tobacco advertisements on the screen, promotion and sponsorship activities, and low tobacco prices all show the "vitality" of tobacco in China, which is hard to contain for a while.

The second is the lack of tobacco control legislation. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control requires parties to actively promote the adoption and implementation of effective legislative, administrative or other measures to prevent exposure to tobacco smoke in public places. However, there is no national tobacco control regulations in China so far, which is another important reason for the ineffective implementation of smoking ban.

So for some places, * * * began to publicly express the failure of smoking ban in China. I think it's too early. The implementation of a policy is bound to find problems in the process, and the key point is how to solve them. The effect of a policy implementation must also be to feel its radiation in a gradual process.

Therefore, in order to achieve the expected goal of smoking ban, I think, one is to increase the intensity of tobacco control, and the other is to strengthen the construction of tobacco control legislation. Only in this way can we realize the national smoking ban in public places and build a green and harmonious social environment.

Question 2: What do you think of the measures to ban smoking? Although considering the health problems, * * * should be responsible to the people, but it should be noted that it is unrealistic to ban smoking nationwide now, one is the economic problem, and the other is the unemployment problem of these enterprises.

It will take a long time to solve this problem step by step. At this stage, * * * can increase the propaganda that smoking is harmful to health, so that people can consciously ban smoking in their thoughts and actions.

Question 3: How to treat the problem of smoking ban in public places? Suggestions on advocating smoking ban in public places.

In daily life, we can see no smoking signs in some public places, but these signs do not remind smokers. In many parts of our city, smokers ignore the existence of no-smoking signs and only consider their own feelings. Smokers smoke in public places, which makes more innocent people smoke passively. Many citizens are very disgusted with "secondhand smoke". We know that tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide contained in tobacco are very harmful to human body. Research shows that 25 life-threatening and health-threatening diseases, including lung cancer and other cancers, heart disease and lung disease, are all related to smoking. Even if you inhale "second-hand smoke" for a short time, it will do harm to your health, and even its harm is far greater than "first-hand smoke". Smoking is not only harmful to health, but also pollutes the environment and harms others, so I give a suggestion to the city * * *:

First of all, it is necessary to increase the propaganda of smoking ban in public places, publicize the harm of smoking in public places through television, newspapers, radio and other media in various ways, and advocate civilized smoking among citizens. Smoking is strictly prohibited in public places, which will subtly affect the behavior of smokers.

Secondly, it is suggested to increase "smoke-free fields" in public places. In addition to posting no-smoking signs in meeting places, offices and public places, the establishment of smoking rooms is encouraged conditionally; Strictly stop the phenomenon of ignoring social morality, smoking in public places and littering cigarette butts, and educate smokers subtly by moral and legal means; Gradually cultivate smokers' good habits of civilized smoking and maintaining social morality.

Third, advocate family smoking ban. Family is the cell of society, and it is the most fundamental supplement and extension of civilized smoking movement in public places to cultivate smokers' habit of quitting smoking and smoking at home. Only when every family member takes smoking cessation and civilized smoking as a natural living habit can social smoking ban be effective.

Finally, we should correct the misconception that smoking is to increase national tax revenue. Tobacco tax is certainly a channel to create tax revenue, but the "contribution" of tobacco tax is very small compared with the damage caused by smoking to smokers' health and to the natural environment and social and cultural environment.

Smoking ban in public places is not only to control smoking, but also to cultivate a civilized and healthy new lifestyle of citizens. Therefore, I suggest starting with our own representatives, consciously not smoking in public places, and setting a good example among the citizens. At the same time, I suggest that the city of * * can attract great attention, and Qi Xin should work together to promote the smoking ban smoothly.

Question 4: What do you think of the smoking ban? It is correct to ban smoking in public places.

Because it concerns the health of others.

So as to protect the rights and interests of passive smokers.

Question 5: What do you think of the anti-smoking measures that I personally support? I hate asking about the pungent smell of smoke!

Question 6: Lin Zexu's anti-smoking measures and his evaluation;

Lin Zexu first found out the opium poisoning situation in Guangzhou, searched various cigarette houses and got a lot of first-hand information.

Lin Zexu, together with Deng Yanzhen and others, summoned thirteen foreign businessmen, ordered them to hand over the imperial edict, ordered foreign opium merchants to pay cigarettes within a time limit, and promised never to carry opium in the future. He also solemnly declared: "If opium lasts for one day, I will never stop until I return."

Nearly 20,000 boxes of opium, about 2.37 million Jin, were collected. On April 22nd (June 3rd), it was destroyed in public at Humen Beach.

Effect: The Opium War started not because smoking was banned, but because business was banned. Directly led to the outbreak of the Opium War.

Significance: The victory of the anti-smoking movement led by Lin Zexu is the first great victory in the history of China people's anti-aggression struggle. This feat dealt a severe blow to foreign opium dealers, safeguarded the dignity and interests of the Chinese nation, and increased the ambition of the people of China.

Question 7: The answer of public administration 4 How to treat the answer of administration in the paper on anti-smoking measures?

I'm here to explore

Question 8: What do you think of the measures to ban smoking? As a signatory to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, China promised to ban smoking in public places from June 5th to1October 9th.

The state promised 20 1 1 to ban smoking in public places, but it failed to be realized. Some places have publicly stated that China has failed to ban smoking. For this phenomenon, I think we should look at it comprehensively:

On the one hand, the starting point of * * * is to better safeguard public health, protect people's health, reduce the harm of second-hand smoke to people's health, and build a more environmentally friendly and green living environment.

On the other hand, the implementation effect of this smoking ban is not obvious. I think this is also due to deep-seated reasons, mainly reflected in two aspects: First, the lack of tobacco control means. Exquisite tobacco packaging, tobacco advertisements on the screen, promotion and sponsorship activities, and low tobacco prices all show the "vitality" of tobacco in China, which is hard to contain for a while.

The second is the lack of tobacco control legislation. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control requires parties to actively promote the adoption and implementation of effective legislative, administrative or other measures to prevent exposure to tobacco smoke in public places. However, there is no national tobacco control regulations in China so far, which is another important reason for the ineffective implementation of smoking ban.

So for some places, * * * began to publicly express the failure of smoking ban in China. I think it's too early. The implementation of a policy is bound to find problems in the process, and the key point is how to solve them. The effect of a policy implementation must also be to feel its radiation in a gradual process.

Therefore, in order to achieve the expected goal of smoking ban, I think, one is to increase the intensity of tobacco control, and the other is to strengthen the construction of tobacco control legislation. Only in this way can we realize the national smoking ban in public places and build a green and harmonious social environment.

Question 9: What do you think of the measures to ban smoking? As a signatory to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, China promised to ban smoking in public places from June 5th to1October 9th.

The state promised 20 1 1 to ban smoking in public places, but it failed to be realized. Some places have publicly stated that China has failed to ban smoking. For this phenomenon, I think we should look at it comprehensively:

On the one hand, the starting point of * * * is to better safeguard public health, protect people's health, reduce the harm of second-hand smoke to people's health, and build a more environmentally friendly and green living environment.

On the other hand, the implementation effect of this smoking ban is not obvious. I think this is also due to deep-seated reasons, mainly reflected in two aspects: First, the lack of tobacco control means. Exquisite tobacco packaging, tobacco advertisements on the screen, promotion and sponsorship activities, and low tobacco prices all show the "vitality" of tobacco in China, which is hard to contain for a while.

The second is the lack of tobacco control legislation. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control requires parties to actively promote the adoption and implementation of effective legislative, administrative or other measures to prevent exposure to tobacco smoke in public places. However, there is no national tobacco control regulations in China so far, which is another important reason for the ineffective implementation of smoking ban.

So for some places, * * * began to publicly express the failure of smoking ban in China. I think it's too early. The implementation of a policy is bound to find problems in the process, and the key point is how to solve them. The effect of a policy implementation must also be to feel its radiation in a gradual process.

Therefore, in order to achieve the expected goal of smoking ban, I think, one is to increase the intensity of tobacco control, and the other is to strengthen the construction of tobacco control legislation. Only in this way can we realize the national smoking ban in public places and build a green and harmonious social environment.

Question 10: What do you think of the measures to ban smoking? Although considering the health problem, * * * is responsible to the people, it should be noted that it is unrealistic to ban smoking nationwide now. One is the economic problem, and the other is the unemployment problem in these enterprises.

It will take a long time to solve this problem step by step. At this stage, * * * can increase the propaganda that smoking is harmful to health, so that people can consciously ban smoking in their thoughts and actions.