What are the differences in the nature of legal affairs, risk control and compliance?

Legal affairs: In a high-end company, it is equivalent to an in-house lawyer, and tends to be legal; In low-end companies, it is equivalent to a public secretary and everyone's typist.

compliance: low-end companies do not have this position. Generally speaking, the legal background is not required, and the work is mainly "regulated industry" to ensure that the enterprise's operation meets the regulatory requirements. Most of the work is to communicate with the regulatory authorities. In fact, it is very suitable for students majoring in political science and secretarial science.

risk control: more financial. In many cases, risk control is done from the perspective of capital security. The risk control of large companies is generally held by people with financial background.

civil cases with legal responsibility, relatively small litigation object and simple litigation relationship, legal opinions on various projects of the company, preliminary legal opinions on merger and acquisition and data collection. Large companies also involve the management of litigation cases in various branches, the cooperation with law firms in large cases, the corresponding settlement of fees by law firms, and the management of case progress. Anyway, it is mainly biased towards small cases and legal opinions.

Responsible for compliance, contract review, later implementation, expiration renewal reminder, signed contract management, risk points in terms, analysis report of unfavorable factors, and update and maintenance of standard terms. Large companies also involve signing contracts, framework cooperation agreements, confidentiality agreements and the like with overseas customers, and mainly prefer contracts and terms. I haven't worked in the industry that needs banking supervision and insurance supervision, but I do need to do this part of the work for compliance. We are supervised by other institutions, and we read the documents issued every day and make various changes according to the latest regulations.

Risk-responsible, annual quality inspection of various certifications, such as ISO, supplier, customer management, project risk assessment, accounts receivable and so on, are really biased towards finance and quality control. Only large companies have it, and small companies basically have no money to do this. They have to write a lot of management methods, which are distributed every day, and subsidiaries are bored to death, and they have to go around for inspections every year. A lot of financial work has been crammed into the post of medium-sized company. For a while, I also worked on three major forms and settled accounts with overseas companies.