After the old man was arrested for stealing pork, he was listed for public display. Why did she voluntarily "show the public"?

The news that an old man in Guangdong has been listed has aroused widespread discussion. An old man is sitting at the gate of the supermarket with a big sign around his neck, which reads? Thief, third time? In this age when everyone values dignity, why did she volunteer to show it to the public?

It is understood that this old man has been a habitual thief. On the day of the incident, after he bought something in the supermarket, the old man deliberately hid the ribs in a bag he prepared in advance, and directly counted some of the goods when he settled the account, but he was caught by the cashier at a glance because it was not the first time for the old man to do so.

in the supermarket, it is clearly posted? Steal one and lose a hundred? The warning slogan, when the old man stole things twice before, has been explicitly warned by the store manager, but no punishment and compensation measures have been taken. After catching the old man stealing things for the third time, the store contacted the old man's daughter-in-law, hoping to have a statement, but the old man's daughter-in-law was very tough, not only refused to pay compensation, but also said that if she saw the old man again, she would be driven out.

because the family members refused to cooperate, the store had to call the police. Because the amount of theft was not large, the police could only give verbal criticism and education after they arrived, so that both parties could adjust privately. Because the family members of the elderly did not agree to the fine, the manager came up with such a method. Because the supermarket often had the phenomenon that the elderly stole things, the elderly were listed for public display with the consent of the police family members and the elderly themselves, which not only punished the elderly, but also warned other thieves.

whether the store's practice is appropriate or not has caused a hot discussion on the Internet. Some people think that the supermarket's practice infringes on the personal rights and reputation rights of the elderly, some people think that the supermarket's practice is an abuse of lynching, and some people think that the person who steals should be punished. We don't know why the elderly are willing to be listed for public display. Maybe in some people's hearts, some material things are more important than their own dignity.