Run once at most. Who proposed it?

20 16, 12 Zhejiang province took the lead in proposing the reform of "running at most once". The reform of "running at most once" is to innovate the service mode of "one window for acceptance, comprehensive service and one time for completion", so that enterprises and the masses can go to the government to handle affairs and realize the administrative goal of "running at most once". The reform of "running once at most" is a people-centered reform, an all-round and deep-seated change from concept, system to style, which embodies the fundamental purpose of our party to serve the people wholeheartedly and highlights the fundamental value orientation of comprehensively deepening reform.

Legal basis:

Article 200 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) If the application of a party meets any of the following circumstances, the people's court shall retry it: (1) There is new evidence enough to overturn the original judgment or ruling; (two) the basic facts identified in the original judgment or ruling lack evidence to prove; (3) The main evidence of the facts ascertained in the original judgment or ruling is forged; (four) the main evidence of the facts identified in the original judgment or ruling has not been cross-examined; (five) the main evidence needed for the trial of the case, the parties can not collect it by themselves due to objective reasons, and apply in writing to the people's court for investigation and collection, but the people's court has not investigated and collected it; (6) The application of the law in the original judgment or ruling is indeed wrong; (seven) the composition of the judicial organization is illegal or the judges who should be avoided according to law have not avoided; (8) A person without capacity for litigation has no legal representative, or a party who should participate in the litigation fails to participate in the litigation due to reasons not attributable to him or his agent ad litem. (nine) in violation of the law, depriving the parties of the right to debate; (ten) without a summons, the judgment is made by default; (eleven) the original judgment or ruling omitted or exceeded the claim; (twelve) the legal documents on which the original judgment or ruling was based have been revoked or changed; (thirteen) the judge has corruption, bribery, favoritism, perverting the law in the trial of the case.