All that glitters is not gold.

an article in p>Forbes magazine in August was titled China's movie industry: all that glitters is n't gold, "China film industry: all that glitters is not gold". This paper analyzes the reasons why China's film industry has grown in a short period of more than ten years, based on the high box office receipts and the innovative operation mode of Tiny Times 3 and No Future, and summarizes some obvious reasons for the rapid development of China's film industry, which may be limited by the length of the article and can only be regarded as general. Strangely, what glitters in the title of the article is not gold, but it seems that there is no corresponding thing in the article. If it refers to the rapid expansion of China's film industry, it looks glittering, but it is not worthy of the name, then it is mostly the sour water spit by jealous and resentful women. If it refers to the two films cited in the article and focused on analysis, then it is a bit reliable, but the analysis of these two films in the article focuses on hype and commercial operation, and basically does not involve content, so it is impossible to describe these two films as shiny but not gold.

I think it is more appropriate to sum up these two films with "All that glitters is not gold".

"I've heard a lot of truth, but I still can't live a good life", the slogan of "I'll see you later", but this is a frustrating and pessimistic sentence that makes people feel completely desperate for the speaker. Maybe only a loser who can't be saved by a fairy would say such a thing.

First of all, the person who said this sentence must be a loser in life, at least in his attitude towards life. There are many criteria for success or failure in life. Career, money, power, fame and family are all dimensions to measure a person's success or failure in life. If you say that your life is not good, then when you sum up your life, you have already defined it as unsuccessful, because it is not good, and it is still not good, that is, it has never been successful, and it has been Loser from beginning to end. So can life really or can it be Lose to the end? I do not think this is necessarily the case. The long road of life, long or short, always has a flash, and there is always a little possibility of success, which can be counted as a stage success moment, and there is always a little hopeful opportunity. Sadly, our hero "still can't live a good life", and the care of the God of Destiny has been wasted by him. Every time he makes a mistake, he misses every step. It is really wonderful to be able to say that you "still can't live a good life". It is not easy to be a winner in life, which requires great efforts and a lot of inexplicable luck. However, it is not so easy to still live a bad life, and every step is wrong. This is not only a problem that can be solved by luck-of course, it is bad luck, but also a factor of losing step by step from oneself, because internal factors are fundamental. So the problem comes:

Secondly, the person who said this sentence must have a great distortion of his own ideas, at least in his consideration of life path and choice. Many things are needed to live a good life, from emotional, ideal, pursuit, belief and other spiritual aspects to material conditions such as money, air and environment. In a specific historical background, the material conditions are almost the same, so for individuals who live normally, the decisive influence on their life is spiritual satisfaction. Since our hero said that he had heard many truths and still had a bad life, there is an inevitable connection between hearing many truths and still having a bad life. Truth does play a guiding role in life path and life choice, but two questions come again. First, what is this truth, the truth of success, or the truth of * * * productism; Is it the truth of self-improvement and morality, or the truth of down-to-earth and unity of knowledge and action? If the reason is not clear, then the action will inevitably be affected. Second, what did he do after listening to the truth? Forget it after listening, or seriously think about it after listening, turn the truth into your own cognition and behavior, and apply it to your own life practice? From the conclusion that he still can't lead a good life in the second half of his sentence, we infer in despair:

1. He probably listened to a lot of fallacies rather than truth. If he really listens to the truth, then if he really does it according to the truth, the result of his bad life is not necessarily, unless he doesn't do it according to the truth or does it well, he will still have a bad life. Because he can't live a good life, it is very likely that he heard fallacies, and fallacies will lead him astray and lead him to a bad life.

2. He can't tell what is truth and what is fallacy. He lacks dialectical thinking and critical thinking. He listens to everything and doesn't listen to anything. He is in a fog and his mind is a mess.

3. He attributed his bad life to listening to many truths, instead of looking for reasons from himself. He attributed it to the misleading of many truths, the lack of independent thinking and free spirit, and he was still a vassal of important thoughts in his bones, not growing up and not being independent. How can such a person live a good life?

It is not necessarily gold that glitters, but glass, and in most cases it is glass. In the era of money first and impetuous utilitarianism, real gold is more difficult to shine. So the more flashing, the more careful you are, and be careful not to be scratched by glass!

At this point of writing, it suddenly occurred to me that our dear director may have said this sentence to the vast number of young people who have been educated under China's characteristic education system for so many years. You can and should reflect on this sentence, Time is up.