Do married women have to move out of their original domicile in the reform of rural collective property rights? Why?

Do married women have to move out of their original domicile in the reform of rural collective property rights? Why?

The current household registration system does not have this strong regulation. After rural couples get married, the woman can settle in the man's house, and the man can also settle in the woman's house. This is a voluntary principle. We can't change the fundamental system of a society just because of the reform of rural collective property rights. In China, rural women enjoy equal treatment with men and no organization or individual can deprive them of this right.

The reform of rural property right system is to check and register all the "three capitals" under the jurisdiction of each rural village, including funds, assets and resources. Its purpose is to further manage and revitalize these funds, assets and resources, prevent losses and create benefits through assets verification.

After the completion of rural assets verification, the shares will be converted into people's shares. In order to make the equity distribution fair and reasonable, the rural population should be recognized as members of collective economic organizations. Only those who are recognized as members of collective economic organizations have the right to enjoy this kind of equity, and only after they have the equity can they enjoy dividends. It is precisely because of this that some rural areas have a tendency to discriminate against married women, thinking that married women should move to their husbands' homes and should not enjoy the interests of their villages.

After rural women get married, should their registered permanent residence be moved? According to the old Israeli custom, a married woman is splashing water, and the registered permanent residence must be moved out. There is no such thing now. People choose places with good economic conditions. It has become normal for the man to choose to settle in the woman. In this case, when determining the members of the village collective economic organization, it is also regarded as a normal phenomenon. Therefore, it is incorrect to think that married women must move their household registration in the reform of rural property rights system.

Equality between men and women. If you marry a monk, you may not be able to settle down. For example, in Beijing and Shanghai, or now in xiong'an new area and xiong'an new area, it is not easy to register children. If you get married, you can register immediately, so all women want to get married in these big cities. It means that if one party doesn't accept it, one party can't force you to cancel your account. Therefore, the land policy stipulates that people will not be reduced or increased. In addition, some people in rural areas have privately replaced and traded cultivated land, changed it into homestead and built houses, and some rural areas have also changed cultivated land into greenhouses. You said that his land has decreased because he changed land for money, so it will not increase. It is said that the problems caused by cultivated land are mainly concentrated in North China Plain, Henan, Hebei, Shandong and Shanxi, and the per capita land distribution is 1 person and 1 mu. The more land in the village, the more points, and the less land, the less points. You go to Northeast China, Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia, where the land is vast and the population is sparse. Everyone is divided into several acres, dozens of acres and hundreds of acres.

A: Married women don't have to move out of their household registration.

The identification of shareholders is an important link in the reform of rural collective property rights system. In some rural areas, it is illegal to ask women to move out of their household registration or not identify their shareholders in the name of traditional democracy.

Article 9 of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that "after registered marriage, the woman can become a member of the man's family and the man can become a member of the woman's family", and does not require the woman to move out of her household registration.

The Opinions of Central the State Council on Steadily Promoting the Reform of Rural Collective Property Rights System clearly points out that "the confirmation of rights should not only be recognized by the majority, but also prevent the majority from infringing on the rights and interests of the minority and effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of women".

In the reform of rural collective property rights system, women's rights and interests are arbitrarily violated, so they can consult and reflect to the Agricultural Working Committee or the Women's Federation to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests.

This problem can be affirmed that the reform of rural collective property rights system does not stipulate that married women must move out.

Married women and son-in-law are special groups in rural areas. According to the old rural customs, some rights and interests in the village are not enjoyed, but now their legitimate rights and interests are guaranteed by law, and marriage or son-in-law registration follows the principle of voluntariness.

In recent years, with the confirmation of land rights, the issuance of various subsidies for benefiting farmers and the acceleration of urbanization, these are based on household registration, so the legitimate rights and interests of married women and son-in-law are infringed from time to time.

These problems have been fully considered in the reform of rural collective property rights system. In fact, the reform itself is to clarify the rights of each member in the collective organization. The reform of rural collective property rights system is being carried out in various places on a pilot basis, which is an important starting point of rural revitalization strategy. Reform is to verify collective assets, resources and funds, find out family property and share assets. Members are clear and farmers become shareholders. This further clarified the ownership of property rights and protected the rights and interests of farmers. At the same time, the collective shareholding system laid the foundation for the development of the market economy.

When the reform of rural collective property rights was implemented in specific villages, it was carried out under the guidance of counties and townships, and there were more than a dozen steps. The main steps are asset verification, member registration and share quantification. The step of membership registration is strictly regulated. First, the village reform team should determine the benchmark date for defining members. Those born after this time are not registered, and those who die are not reduced (inheritable). Secondly, villagers or villagers' representative meetings should determine the way to identify collective membership. Generally speaking, a married woman or son-in-law should not be empty at both ends, let alone occupy both ends. As long as one village determines its members, another village cannot be determined. Members should be publicized in the village for 7 days after registration. If there is any objection, it can be investigated and verified. After no objection, report to the township for review and publicity, and then report to the county for review.

In a word, the reform of rural collective property rights system has fully guaranteed the rights and interests of married women. If you are not clear about the policy, you can consult the township government or the county agricultural department to reflect the problem.

Personal understanding, specific to local government regulations shall prevail.

Hello, I'm glad to answer your question: Do married women have to move out of their original domicile in the reform of rural collective property rights? Why?

The so-called rural collective property rights reform refers to the development of joint-stock cooperative economy in the form of equity in rural collectively owned cultivated land, homestead and collectively operated land, and dividends are paid by shares.

Speaking of reform, it is also a major change in the government's rural economic system. Whether this reform can bring dividends to farmers in rural areas throughout the country remains to be seen. Although the country has tried many times before the reform, I don't think the joint-stock cooperative system is suitable for all farmers.

For example, in underdeveloped areas and remote mountainous areas, it is somewhat unrealistic to develop collective assets in the form of shares. There is a saying that stocks are risky and investment needs to be cautious. For example, in mountainous areas, it is unknown when collectively owned land will be used for real estate and when dividends will be generated. If the collective land is handed over to the boss in the form of shares, are all bosses gods and guaranteed to get dividends every year? According to the law of market economy development, it is impossible, and the market has gains and losses.

Therefore, rural economic reform should fully respect the wishes of farmers, and what can be changed should not be unrealistic. At present, there are many forms of rural land circulation formulated by China's land management law, which is more realistic. For example, on the premise of farmers' willingness, land can be transferred, sublet and exchanged according to law, which is popular among the masses. Individuals and collectives can operate flexibly according to actual conditions. The ultimate goal of land resources utilization, no matter what form of circulation, is to reduce risks and increase farmers' output and income. The situation varies from place to place, and several pilot projects cannot represent the whole countryside.

Take whether the rural collective property right reform mentioned by the landlord needs to be moved out. It can be said that this is a big problem highlighted by the reform. When I look at the information in this field, I always feel that they are all general and scratching their edges. None of them can solve the problem like the land management law. According to the household registration management system, whether the woman marries the man or the man settles in the woman, the local public security organ requires the local police station registered permanent residence to move in. However, this kind of emigration of registered permanent residence does not affect married women's return to their parents' homes to become land, which has been clearly stipulated in the Land Management Law. However, after the reform of rural collective property rights is changed to equity, only village collective members are required to enjoy equity, that is to say, married women who move out of their household registration are no longer village collective members, that is to say, married women cannot enjoy dividends from their parents. This has been touched by the land management law, so it must be changed.

My opinion is that no matter how the rural collective economy is reformed, it can only be based on the current land management law. As long as the land management law is followed, married women can get the equity in their parents' home, because the form of shareholding is only the form of land transfer, and the land system in rural areas of China has not changed, which is the responsibility system based on household contract, that is, as long as all family members should enjoy the equity. It is necessary for married women to move out, which is the need of national household registration management. This is different from land contracting.

There is no such regulation.

The reform of rural collective property rights began to solicit opinions around April, 2065438, mainly the Guiding Opinions on Guiding the Healthy Development of Rural Collective Property Rights Circulation Trading Market formulated by the Central Rural Work Leading Group Office.

The Opinions of the Central Committee of the State Council on Steadily Promoting the Reform of Rural Collective Property Rights System was officially launched around February 20 16. Mainly to solve the outstanding problems such as unclear ownership of collective operating assets, unclear operating income, undisclosed distribution, and lack of protection of members' collective income distribution rights.

If there is a connection between the reform and the migration of married women's household registration, it lies in this point in the Opinions:

(ten) to confirm the membership of rural collective economic organizations. In accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, in accordance with the principles of respecting history, giving consideration to reality, standardizing procedures, and being recognized by the masses, we should make overall consideration of factors such as household registration, contract relationship of rural land, and collective accumulated contributions, coordinate and balance the interests of all parties, do a good job in confirming the membership of rural collective economic organizations, and solve the problem of unclear membership boundaries.

It is required to confirm the members of collective economic organizations and solve the problem of unclear boundaries among members. In many places, "married women" are regarded as a group of people with unclear boundaries, and they are forced to move their household registration in order to clarify the members of collective economic organizations. This is totally unreasonable.

First of all, the Opinions clearly pointed out that the confirmation of membership should not only be recognized by the majority, but also prevent the majority from infringing on the rights and interests of the minority and effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of women. It is women's freedom to move their registered permanent residence after marriage, and no one can force it.

Secondly, Article 33 of the Law on the Protection of Women's Rights and Interests stipulates that no organization or individual may infringe upon the rights and interests of women in rural collective economic organizations on the grounds that women are unmarried, married, divorced or widowed. Local governments cannot do illegal things in the name of reform.

There happened to be a brochure on the reform of rural collective property right system issued by the office of the leading group for the reform of rural collective property right system in Shunping County, which introduced the contents of the reform of rural collective property right system. In addition, according to the land contract law and other relevant laws and regulations, married women do not necessarily lose their family's land contract use right, but they cannot enjoy the land contract use right at the same time. However, according to the principle of "reducing people without reducing land, increasing people without increasing land", there may be cases where married women move into their household registration but can't get the land use right.

There is no national law that requires married women to move their household registration.

Although the share reform of collective property rights is based on household registration, it also combines the length of service. Besides, your registered permanent residence is in Village A, and you got a share. Although you married Village B, Village B has no hukou, so you have no shares. This is the principle that one does not pay too much. It was finished in our place last year. I've never heard of married women moving their accounts.

It is the freedom of others to move or not. There is no law that married women must move their registered permanent residence into the man's house!