Which is better, Housing Finance or Qi Jun?

The two cars you mentioned are the places where everyone at this level is entangled. Both cars are owned by hua dan, a Japanese joint venture brand SUV. We can make some basic comparisons about this. The length, width and height of Toyota Fangrong are 4680mm/1895mm/1690mm respectively, and the wheelbase is 2660mm. The length, width and height of Qi Jun are 4675 mm/1820 mm/1722 mm, respectively, and the wheelbase is 2705 mm It can be seen that Qi Jun's body size is larger and the wheelbase is longer. This is also fully worthy of Qi Jun, which is the superior model of this class.

(Toyota Fangrong)

(Nissan Qi Jun)

Qi Jun not only has more advantages in body size than housing finance, but also has much better seating space than housing finance. Then look at the configuration, and the selected models are all 204,800 yuan models. First of all, Fangrong is equipped with a double wishbone suspension on the rear suspension, and Qi Jun is equipped with a multi-link self-selection. These two kinds of suspension have their own advantages and disadvantages. The pursuit of comfort, you can consider Qi Jun, the pursuit of a little manipulation of the basic lock in glory.

(Toyota Fangrong)

(Nissan Qi Jun)

Secondly, compared with Qi Jun, Fangrong has more full-size spare tires, front and rear air curtains, sports mode, full LED headlight group, adaptive high beam, automatic anti-glare, automatic headlights, ultraviolet glass, rearview mirror heating, rear privacy glass PM2.5 filtering system, etc. In Qi Jun, there are more electronic parking, tire pressure monitoring and display, parallel assistance, lane departure warning, reversing warning, panoramic sunroof and leather steering wheel. It's better than housing. From the use point of view, housing finance is better than Qi Jun. It will be better than Rong in comfort configuration, such as a leather steering wheel and leather seats.

(Toyota Fangrong)

(Nissan Qi Jun)