Why does sending and receiving text messages reduce IQ?

Frequent use of text messages and e-mails can reduce IQ by more than twice as much as smoking marijuana. This is what psychologists say. They found that tapping the keyboard of a mobile phone or a computer or viewing electronic information can temporarily reduce the IQ of users 10%. According to British researchers, the speed of this mental decline is unfavorable compared with the IQ drop of 4 percentage points caused by smoking marijuana. They call it information mania to enhance the stupid flying phoenix. Frequent sending and receiving text messages and emails will reduce people's IQ. This kind of harm is more than twice that of smoking marijuana on IQ. Psychologists have found that sending or receiving electronic information by using mobile phones or tapping computer keyboards will temporarily reduce the IQ of users by about 10 percentage points. According to the research of British researchers, smoking marijuana will reduce IQ by%, compared with that, the mental decline rate caused by frequent use of electronic text information is more serious. Researchers call this temporary stupidity "information mania". Studies on sleep deprivation show that the decline in IQ caused by electronic obsession is equivalent to a sleepless night. A study commissioned by HP, a technology company, concluded that information fanaticism is mainly a problem for adult employees, especially men. The obvious decline in IQ is attributed to the constant interference of "always on" technology, and employees should focus on what they should do. Information fanaticism means that they can't concentrate, because their minds are almost always ready to respond to technology, rather than focusing on the task at hand. According to the report, employees interrupt business meetings and social gatherings due to weak health, thus reducing work efficiency. Studies on sleep deprivation show that mental decline caused by obsession with electronic products is equivalent to a sleepless night. The research results commissioned by Hewlett-Packard Technology Company show that information mania is mainly manifested in adults, especially adult men. The reason for this obvious decline in intelligence is that "ubiquitous" technology always distracts employees when they should concentrate on their work. Information mania means that their consciousness is almost always in a state of responding to "technology", so they can't concentrate on the work at hand. According to the report, because of the weakness of workers, they lost the productivity of interrupting business meetings and social collection. It adds that the brain also finds it difficult to handle a large number of tasks at the same time, thus reducing its overall efficiency. Although modern technology can bring great benefits, excessive use will not only damage a person's thoughts, but also their social life. In addition, information fanaticism has a negative impact on colleagues, increasing pressure and dissatisfaction. 90% respondents think that colleagues who reply to emails or messages in face-to-face meetings are very rude. However, one third of the British people think it is not only acceptable, but also diligent and efficient. As part of the research project, Dr. Glenn Wilson, a psychologist at the University of London, studied the impact on IQ. This is a very real and common phenomenon, he said. We found that if we don't control it, information fanaticism will reduce employees' mental acuity, thus damaging their work performance. Companies should participate in a more balanced and reasonable way. The report also adds that it is difficult for the brain to deal with many problems at the same time, and its overall efficiency will be reduced. In addition, although modern technology can help us a lot, excessive use of technology will also bring harm to people's brains and social life. In addition, information mania will have a negative impact on colleagues, increasing their pressure and hostility. 90% respondents think it is very impolite to reply to emails in face-to-face meetings. But one third of the British people not only accept this behavior, but also think it shows that they are hardworking and efficient. Dr Glenn Wilson, a psychologist from University of London, is doing a research project called "This is a real universal phenomenon", and the influence of information fanaticism on IQ is part of it. He said: "Without inspection and control, information mania will reduce employees' mental sensitivity, thus affecting their work efficiency. Therefore, the company should advocate a more balanced and appropriate way of working. "Core word memory: 1.text V. Sending short messages (SMS) [new meaning] 2. Tap vt Exhausted. Mark vt. For labels, please refer to ... such as classification note 5. The deprivation verb is deprivation. Deprivation, which makes a loss of 6. Equivalent to (when) in …, equal to (and) in, equivalent to … 7. Appointment; Appointment. Appoint, appoint, entrust and commission production; Commission 8. Attributable to 9. Compete with ... cope with 10. And conj. Although, for example, although grandparents love children very much, they are very strict with them 1 1. Disapproving vote against 12. Poll v., win the vote, get 13. Face to face; Face to face. Unchecked adjustments have not stopped. Uncontrolled 15. Proper use of unhealthy internet may be harmful to mental health. According to the research of Carnegie Mellon University, the appearance of Internet use will lead to the decline of mental health. This two-year study shows that even people who spend only a few hours a week surfing the Internet are more depressed and lonely than those who don't surf the Internet often. It's not that people who already feel bad spend more time online, but that using the internet actually obviously leads to bad feelings. Research by Carnegie Mellon University shows that using the Internet may lead to a decline in mental health. Two-year research shows that people who surf the Internet more often are more likely to feel depressed and lonely than those who surf the Internet less often, even if they only surf the Internet for a few hours a week. This is not to say that people who already have bad emotions spend more time online, but that using the Internet does seem to induce people's bad emotions. The researchers were puzzled by the results, which was completely contrary to their expectations. They expect that the Internet will be more social than TV, because it allows users to choose their information and communicate with others. Researchers are puzzled by these results because they are contrary to their expectations. They predict that surfing the Internet may be healthier socially than watching TV, because the Internet allows users to choose the information they need and communicate with others. Researchers speculate that using the internet reduces the time spent with family and friends, which may be the reason for the decline in happiness. Virtual communication without face and entity may not be as satisfying psychologically as real dialogue, and the relationship formed through it may be shallower. Another possibility is that access to the wider world through the internet will make users less satisfied with their lives. Researchers speculate that the fact is that surfing the Internet reduces the time spent with family and friends, which may explain the decline of their mental health. Compared with face-to-face conversation, this kind of "virtual" communication without seeing each other and people may make people feel less satisfied psychologically. The friendship people have forged through this kind of communication will not be too deep.