1069 has a pre-litigation notice at the beginning. Is it true to unsubscribe?

1. You know, no one has the right to disclose the personal information of the debtor, so this information is illegal, which only means that it was sent by the collection staff.

2. Only the relevant departments of the public security organs have the right to investigate your personal privacy and personal information, but do you think you can use the public security organs to investigate your information before your debts are overdue and you have been prosecuted? Is it necessary to make such a fuss? There is no doubt that such a short message must be related to the fright of the collection.

3. As long as you have not been sued by the bank or platform, have not received a formal summons from the court, and have gone through the process of prosecution, then no one or any department has the right to freeze your property and assets.

The court has this right to freeze only when it needs to be enforced after litigation procedures and court decisions.

How to use the simplest method to identify the authenticity of short messages, I hope it will help.

1, as long as the courts, public security organs and other contents appear in general short messages, they are basically false;

2. As long as there is information about being wanted, being listed as a untrustworthy person, Lao Lai, etc. , basically fake;

3. It is basically false to send a text message saying that the public security department will take the private mobile phone number;

4. What will happen if the information is sent and the contact with Director XX and Commissioner XX is false?

5. The sending SMS number starts with 1069, and the word unsubscribe will appear after the SMS. These are all sent by commercial short message platforms, and you can send short messages in groups as long as you buy them.