The answer is a magical lawsuit.

The answer is a magical lawsuit, a strange lawsuit.

Liu Yanmin

1968, a little girl named Edith in Nevada, USA, knew the first letter "O" of "OPEN" on the gift box. This surprised my mother and asked her how she met. Edith said, "Miss Vera taught me."

After the mother praised her daughter, a complaint brought Miss Vera's kindergarten Laura III to court. Because she thinks her daughter can say "O" like round objects like apples, the sun, football and eggs unconsciously, but Edith has lost this ability since Laura III taught her to read 26 letters in kindergarten. She asked the kindergarten to be responsible for the consequences and compensate Edith for her mental disability100000 USD.

After the complaint was filed, Nevada was in an uproar immediately. Laura III kindergarten thinks this mother is crazy, some parents think she is making a mountain out of a molehill, and her lawyer doesn't agree with her, thinking that this lawsuit is a waste of energy. However, my mother insisted on this lawsuit, even if she lost everything.

Three months later, the case was heard in the Nevada Legislative Yuan. The final result was unexpected: Laura III kindergarten lost the case because the 23 members of the jury were moved by a story told by the mother in her defense.

She said: I once traveled to a country in the east. I saw two swans in a park. One has its left wing cut off, the other is intact, the one with its wings cut off is kept in a bigger pond, and the other is kept in a smaller pond. I was puzzled at that time, so I asked the administrator there. They said it would prevent escape. I asked why? They explained that people who cut off a wing can't keep their balance and will fall off after flying; In the small pond, although the wings were not cut off, there was no need to glide after taking off, so we had to stay in the water honestly. At that time, I was very shocked, and I was shocked by the cleverness of the orientals. But I also feel very sad, sorry for the two swans. Today, I am fighting this lawsuit about my daughter, because I think Edith turned into a swan in Laura III kindergarten. They cut off Edith's wing, an imaginary wing, and people have thrown her into the small pond with only ABC.

This defense later became the basis for Nevada to amend the Citizen Education Protection Act. Now the American civil rights law stipulates that children have the right to play in school. It is not known whether this right is included because of the mother's lawsuit, but one thing Americans know very well: this provision has kept the United States ahead of the world in science and technology, and it has also made the United States have many more young millionaires than other countries.

[Appreciation of Excellent Works]

This paper describes a bizarre case: more than 40 years ago, in Nevada, a mother took her three-year-old daughter to court because she knew the letter "O". The case ended in the kindergarten losing the case, and the mother received compensation of $6.5438 million. In fact, this case also contains strange meanings. After reading this article, we will understand that its social benefits have already far exceeded the value of $654.38+million.

This strange lawsuit looks ridiculous on the surface, but it is really reasonable. Before a child knows the letter "O", she can say "O" as an apple, the sun, a football, an egg and other round things, but since the kindergarten teacher taught her to know 26 letters, the child has lost this imagination. The child's mother thought that the kindergarten teacher had cut off her daughter's imaginary wings, which caused the child to be mentally disabled, so she took the kindergarten to court.

Arguably, what is wrong with teachers teaching children real knowledge? However, the mother's statement is not unreasonable. Kindergarten really deprived my daughter of her imagination. That's the truth! When everyone thought the lawsuit was incredible and unanimously opposed, mother remained firm. It is really "the whole world is drunk, and she wakes up alone"! The court is about evidence. In her defense, the mother told a story that shocked everyone based on her own personal experience. She vividly compared her daughter to a swan whose wings were cut off in the story-those were her daughter's imaginary wings! This story is convincing enough to convince all mankind! obviously

You see, it's natural that she won the case.

After reading this article, we can't help but be impressed by this mother's excellent knowledge. She showed a unique maternal love for her daughter. What she cares about is definitely not the compensation of 10 million dollars, but the loss of her daughter's imagination and future development. From this mother, we can see the great differences between Chinese and American cultures: we attach importance to early education and often overemphasize children's basic education, such as how many Chinese characters a child can know, how many ancient poems he can recite, how many songs he can play, and what kind of paintings he can draw ... But we just ignore an important aspect: that is, suppressing or even depriving children of their imagination.

Recently, the author had the privilege of listening to an academic report entitled "The Relationship between Modern Literature and Chinese Education" by Kong, a famous contemporary scholar and professor of Peking University, which was quite enlightening. Mr. Kong made such reflections on China's education. He believes that contemporary education in China is not "elite education" but "national education", and unified teaching materials have become a tool to cultivate a generation of "comprehensive citizens". For example, what primary school students learn about "heaven, earth, man, knife, mouth and hands" seems to be a kind of "happy education" on the surface, but it is actually similar to a kind of "ignorant education", but it has become a way to strengthen the country. Therefore, we have to adopt such an educational method. It is gratifying that the promulgation of the new curriculum and the implementation of quality education in primary and secondary schools across the country have brought infinite vitality and vitality to our education, but the educational customs formed over thousands of years cannot be changed overnight. It seems that quality education focusing on ability training has indeed become the direction and focus of contemporary education reform in China.

Let our children grow wings of imagination and soar in the blue sky of the motherland!

[Inquiry Practice]

1. Write the idioms in the text according to the meaning of the sentence.

(1) Get rid of all possessions. ( )

(2) metaphor big disputes or agitation. ( )

Please summarize the content and theme of this article in concise language.

3. What is the "strange" reason of this lawsuit?

4. What do you think is the difference between Chinese and American education? Why is this difference formed?

5. What are the characteristics of this article in selecting materials? Please make a brief summary.

6. How did the mother in this article persuade the judge to win the case without any support, and aroused public concern about this issue?

7. What do you think after reading this article?

[Reference Answer] 1. 1 despair; 2 Xuan ran * * * 2. Content: Edith's mother sued the kindergarten professor for literacy to curb her daughter's imagination. After winning the case, Edith's mother's defense became the basis for Nevada to amend the Civic Education Protection Law. Objective: ① It is more important to cultivate children's imagination in games than to impart knowledge. It is more important for children to develop their imagination in play than to learn knowledge. Don't impart knowledge to children too early, which will restrict the development of children's imagination. Strange is suing for her daughter's damaged imagination. ② Strange was sued for teaching students to read in kindergarten. 4. Difference: China attaches importance to early education, and often overemphasizes children's basic education and ignores the cultivation of children's abilities; The United States does not pay attention to basic education, but pays attention to cultivating children's imagination and creativity. Reason: Education in China is bound by "examination-oriented". Schools pay attention to the improvement of enrollment rate, teachers pay attention to the transfer of knowledge, and parents pay attention to scores. Everyone wants their children to be admitted to a good school. 5. The materials selected in this paper are novel, peculiar, typical and accurate. The specific manifestations are as follows: ① The selected cases are very common trivial matters in teaching life; 2. See the big from the small, and gain insight into the chronic diseases of teaching ideas from small things; (3) Point out the importance of cultivating imagination and its fruitful results-"The United States has always been at the forefront of the world in science and technology, and there are far more young millionaires in the United States than in other countries." (4) Describing the conflict between the two educational ideas opens up the theme of legal literature and gives people a refreshing enjoyment. 6. The mother told a story in court, and skillfully used metaphors to explain the truth, which not only vividly explained the truth, but also made the argument poetic. The swan's wings were cut off and placed under house arrest in a narrow space, which made us see the cruelty of the "manager". The "management" of the "little girl" in the kindergarten was similar to the swan's broken wings and was placed under house arrest, which shocked people's souls-this essential communication made everyone suddenly realize the negligence and cruelty in this unintentional study. Winning the case is reasonable and significant. The last paragraph is a full explanation of the significance of this lawsuit. 7. Open questions and be reasonable.

After the administrative litigation case is filed, should the relevant civil litigation be terminated? If the relevant civil disputes can be solved together after the administrative litigation case is filed, it shall be terminated.

administrative procedure law of the people's republic of china

Article 61 In an administrative lawsuit involving administrative licensing, registration, expropriation and requisition, as well as a civil dispute award made by an administrative organ, the people's court may try it together if the parties apply to solve the relevant civil disputes.

In administrative proceedings, if the people's court believes that the trial of administrative cases should be based on the judgment of civil proceedings, it may order the suspension of administrative proceedings.

A lawsuit usually goes to court several times from filing a complaint to closing the case. Theoretically, at least twice.

File a case once and hold a court session once. If the trial goes well, the case can be closed in court. . . .

It is beneficial to seek the facts and laws of civil litigation cases, but not knowing the procedure leads to losing the case.

Author: Admin Date of publication: June 2, 20071read: 353 times.

Mr. Wang is a friend of the boss of a company in Shenzhen. In June, 1999, 1 1, Mr. Wang signed a purchase and sale agreement with the company, stipulating that Mr. Wang was responsible for the product sales in Shandong market. After Mr. Wang negotiated the sales contract with the Shandong customer, the company delivered the goods to the Shandong customer according to the contract information sent by Mr. Wang, and the Shandong customer remitted the payment to the company account, and extracted 5% from each business. After signing the contract, Mr. Wang began to be responsible for the sales of the company in Shandong Province. By March 2005, Mr. Wang had worked for six years, during which some customers in Shandong owed the company 265,438+00,000 yuan.

Consultant: Should I pay back the payment owed by Shandong customers?

Lawyer: First, let's analyze the agreement you signed with a company in Shenzhen in June1999+1October. This agreement is actually an agency contract. You are engaged in agency behavior within the scope of agency license, and the sales risk is borne by the principal. Moreover, buying and selling is a kind of buying and selling behavior. After the buyer receives the sold goods, he will continue to sell them at his own risk.

Consultant: The name of the agreement we signed is the Purchase and Sale Agreement. How can it be regarded as supply and marketing?

Lawyer: According to the contract law, the nature of a contract is determined not by its name, but by its essence. Therefore, according to the contents of your appraisal agreement, it should be considered as a consignment contract, and the two sides are agents.

Consultant: In February, 2005, the company made a statement for me to sign. I had done it before, but this time the company had a note on the statement, which said that Wang Moumou, a customer in Shandong, owed the company 2 1000 yuan. I signed it without reading it carefully.

Lawyer: Debt is an act based on facts. Since there is no basic debt between the company and you, your signature on this statement is a misunderstanding and can be revoked.

Consultant: But the company sued me based on this statement, and the court ruled that I lost the case. Why? You see, this is the verdict.

Lawyer (after reading the verdict): The verdict says that you have no evidence to prove that there is no buying and selling relationship between you and the company, but only an agency relationship. Excuse me, have you submitted the agreement to the court?

Counselor: I brought all the materials when I was in court, and the opposing lawyer said that I would not cross-examine.

Lawyer: Have you received the notice of proof from the court? There is a time limit for proof in the draft notice.

Consultant: What are the precautions and the time limit for giving evidence?

Lawyer: The time limit for adducing evidence, also known as the time limit for adducing evidence, refers to the time limit for the parties to present evidence to the court or the other party within a specific time limit. If the time limit is exceeded, corresponding responsibilities will arise. If the court will serve you with a notice of proof during the proceedings and inform you of the time limit for proof, you must submit the evidence within the time limit for proof.

Consultant: I haven't received the certificate notice yet! This is the material that the court gave me. Please have a look.

Lawyer (after reading): Isn't this a notice of proof?

Counselor: The court gave me so many materials that I felt useless!

Lawyer: The court has served you with a notice of proof. You didn't give evidence within the time limit stipulated in the notice of proof. At the court hearing, the evidence you provided exceeded the time limit. Because the other party disagreed with the cross-examination, the court ruled that you had no evidence to prove it. That's why you lost the case because you didn't understand the procedure.

Consultant: This is unreasonable. I have reasons and evidence. Just because I didn't advance within the prescribed time limit, it's unfair to assume that I lost the case!

Lawyer: The time limit system of proof was established in China to prevent the parties from using the procedural space to make a surprise attack. Postponement of the lawsuit is an improvement. In the past, in the process of civil trial in China, the parties could put forward "supplementary evidence" or "new evidence" at will throughout the first-instance proceedings, which seriously affected the seriousness of the law, the authority of the judge, the legitimacy of the parties' evidence and the timeliness and order of the proceedings. Now that there is a time limit for proof, we can overcome these problems and better reflect the fairness of the law.

Member of Baoan Daily Volunteer Legal Service Lawyers Group: Guangdong Shenbao Law Firm.

Lawyer: Wei Hanping

-

Creditors lose by improper use of procedures.

July 2005

I. Brief Introduction of the Case On June 22nd, 2000, Li Yi, the plaintiff, was injured by electric shock while climbing/playing on a 10/0 kV high-voltage pole on her way home from school, and her right arm was cut off. She was identified as a second-degree disability by the forensic doctor, and needed to prepare a prosthetic aid to compensate for some functions. Li Yi, the plaintiff, appealed to Xiangfan Intermediate People's Court on March 6, 2003, demanding that the defendant laohekou city Power Supply Bureau (hereinafter referred to as the Power Supply Bureau) pay1180,000 yuan for the prosthesis.

Two. In the first trial, according to the prosthetic certificate issued by Xiangfan Prosthetic Station provided by the plaintiff, the Hubei Intermediate People's Court predicted that the prosthetic cost before adulthood was 250,000 yuan/set, and the prosthetic cost after adulthood was1180,000 yuan, so it ordered the defendant's power supply bureau to pay 80% compensation and 945 160 yuan.

After the judgment of this case, it aroused strong repercussions in the society. Xiangfan Evening News once reported in the article "Heavy Compensation". Since then, CCTV has also made two corresponding reports.

The defendant's power supply bureau refused to accept the first-instance judgment and appealed for a revision of the judgment on the grounds that the cost of prosthetic limbs was seriously too high.

The Higher People's Court of Hubei Province found through trial that the charging standard for prosthetic limbs determined in the first instance was the price of foreign products. Later, under the auspices of the Higher People's Court of Hubei Province, the two sides reached a mediation agreement: the defendant power supply bureau compensated the plaintiff Li Yi for the loss of 300,000 yuan from the electric shock accident and closed the case.

Third, the lawyer's comment: The lawyer did not participate in the first-instance procedure, but participated in the lawsuit on behalf of the defendant power supply bureau from the second-instance procedure. After reading it, I think that the focus of this case is to accurately define the amount of prosthetic expenses according to the principle of compensation foresight, and to carry out agency work as a starting point. After investigation, it is found that the prosthetic cost determined by the prosthetic certificate issued by Xiangfan Prosthetic Station is the price of French-made prosthetic limbs, which does not meet the legal requirements.

Because according to Article 4 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Compensation Cases for Personal Injury Caused by Electric Shock: "The expenses of appliances for the disabled must be calculated according to the expenses of domestic popular appliances with the hospital certificate", the intelligent prosthesis fee issued by Xiangfan Prosthetic Station is 250,000 yuan/French-made prosthesis price, while the domestic prosthesis price is 26,000 yuan/appliance. The original judgment took the price of artificial limbs made in France as the basis for determining the amount of damage, which was contrary to the judicial interpretation.

In the case of passive judgment in the first instance, in the second instance, we firmly grasped the key point of improper evidence in the original judgment and incorrect prediction of prosthetic expenses, started the agency work, and finally reached a mediation agreement, which reduced the high compensation cost of 945,000 yuan to 300,000 yuan, achieving the expected effect of the power supply bureau's appeal.

1. Brief introduction of the case.

Defendant Dai is an employee of the plaintiff Suizhou Vehicle Factory, and is responsible for the sales of the plaintiff's southern film. During the period from 1995 to 1997, the defendant delivered goods worth more than 2.03 million yuan to Southern Film customers, and recovered the payment of1500,000 yuan, 5406438+08438+08.

Previously, the plaintiff formulated the "Sales Management System" internally, in which Article 7 stipulated that the sales staff should handle the external delivery, and if the payment could not be recovered, the sales staff should make compensation. Accordingly, the defendant issued a repayment agreement to the plaintiff on June 1998 and June 10, and promised to repay 540 184. 13 yuan. After being urged by the plaintiff, the defendant failed to repay the debt on schedule, and originally told Suizhou Intermediate People's Court to claim the creditor's rights.

Second, the trial situation.

The Intermediate People's Court of Suizhou City, Hubei Province, as the court of first instance, made a judgment (2003) Sui Min Chu Zi No.20, holding that the repayment agreement was legal and valid, and ordered the defendant to repay 540 184. 13 yuan as agreed, and bear the legal costs 12000 yuan.

The defendant refused to accept the judgment of non-first-instance, and entrusted our lawyer to appeal to the Higher People's Court of Hubei Province. After hearing the case, the Provincial Higher People's Court held that the two parties were not civil disputes between equal subjects and should not support the plaintiff's claim, and made a ruling (2005) E ZiNo. 1 1: the first-instance judgment was revoked and the plaintiff's claim was directly rejected. At this point, the repayment agreement held by the plaintiff still cannot realize the creditor's rights.

Third, the lawyer's opinion.

The plaintiff lost the case, and failed to realize the creditor's right of 54,065,438+084.13 yuan due to improper characterization of its legal relationship and wrong selection procedure.

After accepting the entrustment, the lawyer formed an agency view through investigation and research, that is, the creditor's right advocated by the plaintiff is not the property relationship between equal subjects, but the labor dispute arising from the implementation of the internal system, and the people's court should not directly accept it. The reasons are as follows: the defendant is the plaintiff's staff, and it is a duty behavior to be responsible for the sales work (delivery and receipt) in the southern region. Both parties are managed and managed labor relations, and the rights and obligations of labor relations, except the labor contract signed by both parties, are essentially part of the labor contract under the premise of not violating the law. In this case, Article 7 of the plaintiff's sales management system stipulates the compensation liability of the sales staff.

It can be seen that the payment obligation determined in the repayment agreement formed later is essentially the liability for compensation in the implementation of the sales management system, in other words, the defendant's responsibility in undertaking the labor contract.

According to the spirit of the Supreme People's Court's "Reply on whether the Court Accepts Disputes over Long-term Loan Losses Caused by Performing Official Duties", in this personal labor relationship, the disputes over creditor's rights and debts arising from performing duties do not belong to the property relationship between equal subjects, but rather to the labor relationship. Disputes arising from labor relations should follow the procedural principle of arbitration before trial. If the plaintiff brings a lawsuit directly without arbitration, which does not meet the procedural requirements, the lawsuit shall be dismissed.

In the second trial, the Higher People's Court of Hubei Province adopted the above viewpoint, and finally directly rejected the plaintiff's claim from the procedure.

July 2(nd), 2005

Excerpt from China Travel Service. com

All of the above are from the Internet.

How to inquire about litigation cases? Go to the filing court of the court, find out who the judge is, get the phone number of the judge and contact the judge.

What is the "ape lawsuit"? Darwin overthrew the "creationism" with the theory of evolution in his scientific masterpiece The Origin of Species, which completed a leap in human understanding of nature. However, in the 66th year after the publication of the Origin of Species and the 43rd year after Darwin's death, an absurd "ape lawsuit" actually happened in the so-called most developed United States.

The defendant who explained Darwin's theory of evolution in class was brought to trial and fined $65,438+000.

In the early 1920s, an anti-evolution movement led by Brian, a democratic politician, arose in American society, which had such a great influence on American politics that the Florida legislature passed a resolution at 1923, claiming that "Darwinism, atheism and agnosticism" should not be taught as truth in state public schools. 1925 Tennessee Act more clearly declares that any teacher in all universities, normal schools and other public schools at all levels in the state will be considered illegal and guilty if he teaches any heresy that denies that God created man.

With the flood of this trend, on May 7th, 1925, Brian and the local government in Dayton, Tennessee filed a lawsuit against scopes, a young local biology teacher, for teaching evolution in class, which violated the laws of the state. The indictment reads: "If people evolved from apes, what did God do?" The Dayton Town Court decided to hold a hearing on the case on July 10.

This case shocked the whole United States. On the day of the trial, many prestigious professors and scientists took their seats in the court, ready to defend the defendant. More than 100 reporters flocked to the scene to report. Fundamentalists from the mountains near Dayton came to cheer for Brian. This small town with a population of only 1500 suddenly boiled.

The plaintiff's main lawyer is Brian, the leader of the anti-evolution movement. He is eloquent and was elected as the presidential candidate by the Democratic Party for three times. The defenders of the defendant are three famous lawyers. The lineup of both sides is amazing, but the jury is dwarfed. Of the 12 jurors, three have read nothing but the Bible, and one is actually illiterate.

The next day, the prosecution began, and the court summoned witnesses to appear in court. Two students in scopes timidly testified that scopes taught them the theory of evolution. But they added that they were not poisoned. At this time, Brian waved his biology textbook and condemned the scientist who came to Dayton to defend the defendant: "The Bible will never be driven out of court by experts from afar."

At noon on the third day, it was the jury's turn to decide. Jurors gathered in the corner of the lawn and discussed it quietly for 9 minutes. After that, the judge finally announced the verdict: the defendant scopes was fined 100 USD and paid all the trial expenses. 100 was a lot of money at that time. This is a classic lawsuit in the history of American science and law-"the ape lawsuit".

The defendant in a civil lawsuit determines whether it is feasible.

Cloning is a transliteration of English word "clone" or "clone", and English word "clone" comes from Greek word "Klone", which originally meant to cultivate plants by asexual propagation or vegetative propagation, such as cutting and grafting. In Chinese mainland, it is translated as "asexual reproduction", and in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao, it is generally translated as reproduction, colonization or colony. There are more exact words in Chinese to express cloning, such as "asexual reproduction", "clone" and "pure line". Cloning refers to the asexual reproduction of organisms through somatic cells and the group of offspring individuals with the same genotype formed through asexual reproduction. Usually, individuals or groups with the same genes as the original individuals are produced through asexual reproduction by biotechnology.

The magical sinkhole answers the wonders of the world.

The ground fissure scenic spot is located in the mountainous area south of fengjie county in the west of the Three Gorges of the Yangtze River. It is adjacent to Qutang Gorge in the Three Gorges Scenic Area in the north, Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture in Hubei Province in the south and Longgupo Ancient Human Cultural Site in Wushan in the east. It is 37.5 kilometers long from east to west and 19.5 kilometers wide from north to south with an area of 340 square kilometers. It has jurisdiction over five scenic spots: Tiankeng Sewer, Longqiao River, Labyrinth River, Jiupan River and Maocaoba. The lowest altitude is 236.4 meters and the highest altitude is 2084.2 meters. The Tianjingxia Bridge, which has been developed in the ground fissure, is about 5 kilometers away from the Huitoushi section, and there is a plank road from Luojiaping to the ground fissure, forming a loop. In the meantime, scenic spots are dotted with many grotesque caves and shafts, and countless legends and stories haunt them. There are many kinds of rocks on both sides of the strait. On the rock wall, the jungle covers the sky and the jungle is interdependent. Tiankeng Rift Valley is a colorful scroll of painters, including stone forests, caves, depressions and shafts ... everything is precious.

Tiankeng is located in Xiaozhai Village, Zhu Jing Township, fengjie county, with a maximum diameter of 626 meters at the mouth, a minimum diameter of 537 meters, a maximum diameter of 522 meters at the bottom and a vertical height of 666.2 meters, with a total volume of1/93.48 million cubic meters. It is the largest karst funnel in the world. The cliffs around Tiankeng Mouth are like axes and knives, which are magnificent. There are countless unfathomable caves and a surging underground river in the pit. Chinese and western explorers have explored the sinkhole many times, and found that the underground river in the sinkhole flows to the maze river through the outlet hole. It is speculated that the underground river in the sinkhole comes from the mysterious ground fissure.

Tiankeng Rift Valley is a colorful long scroll of Danqing, where you can see various landscapes of karst landforms. Stone forest, peak forest, cave, depression, Tiansheng Bridge, Luoshuixi, blind valley, funnel, shaft ... everything is included. In particular, the world's number one xiaozhai tiankeng, with its mysterious seams and strange scenes, fascinated and impressed the viewers, marveling at the wonders of nature. At the same time, the clear and transparent trickling streams, pristine grasslands and lush forests in the mountains constitute a paradise on earth. At the same time, because the altitude is 1000 meters, it has become the best place to escape the summer and enjoy the snow scene. Moreover, the rural customs here are more like a rich Tujia love song, and its simple folk customs make countless Chinese and foreign tourists linger.

Tiankeng Ground Fissure Scenic Area is located in the south of fengjie county, Chongqing, at the west end of the Three Gorges of the Yangtze River. It is a part of Qiyao Mountain and Wushan Mountain, covering an area of about 400 square kilometers. The whole scenic spot is divided into ten areas, including Xiaozhai Tiankeng, Tianjingxia Ground Fissure, Labyrinth River, Longqiao River, Jiupan River, Taoyuan River, Longmen Bridge, Maocaoba, Qingyan and Jianshan. The Tiankeng, Ground Fissure, Labyrinth River and Longqiao River that we are going to visit this time are relatively exciting and officially open parts of the whole scenic spot. The scenic spot is connected to Lichuan City, Enshi City and Jianshi County in Hubei Province in the south, and Wushan County in Chongqing in the east, about 50 kilometers away from fengjie county City.

Tiankeng is a common name of funnel in karst geology in geography. There are many sinkholes in this area, which is almost impossible to count. There is one every few hundred meters. Some holes are as small as teacups, while others are as big as stadiums. There is a huge sinkhole in Xiaozhai Village, Zhu Jing Township. The maximum diameter of the surface of the sinkhole is 626 meters, the depth of the sinkhole is 666.2 meters, and the maximum diameter of the bottom of the sinkhole is 522 meters, which is the largest funnel found in the world. The rift valley is also a peerless wonder admired by Chinese and foreign scientists. Between the two valleys, there is a mysterious deep valley hidden by Woods, which looks like a big gap on the earth from a distance.

Fengjie Tiankeng Ground Seam (2 sheets)

The most wonderful thing is that the clear and green streams have shaped a magical and huge underground cave group in this limestone area. Wan Xinnan, a professor at Chengdu University of Technology who has led French explorers to explore here many times, said that he has been to many scenic spots and thinks it is the most magical place. The geology is changeable and the caves are strange, and the whole scenic spot is almost riddled with holes. British and French explorers are even more full of praise, calling it a "world-class magical cave." Since 1994, explorers from China, Britain, France, Ireland and other countries have visited Fengjie many times and discovered a huge underground cave system, but after seven or eight explorations, they only know the tip of the iceberg. So far, they have discovered the world's largest funnel xiaozhai tiankeng, the ground fissure in the courtyard gorge with the highest aspect ratio, and the underground river Longqiao River, which has not been fully understood, but is indeed a world-class underground river. It is not clear how many caves there are in the sinkhole, and whether there will be an amazing world-class landscape here is still a mystery. The caves in Tiankeng Ground Fissure Scenic Area have attracted the attention of scientists and explorers at home and abroad, and we believe that its mysterious veil will be gradually unveiled.

1August 1996 and1February 1997, Mr Andy, Secretary General of the International Cave Exploration Association, personally led the expedition team to inspect the ground fissures. Due to the limitation of exploration equipment, the underground caves in the ground fissures are changeable, and the Sino-British joint exploration activities have only advanced a few kilometers in the caves. What strange sights are there in this mysterious world, whether the underground river in the crack is connected with the world's largest funnel Xiaozhai tiankeng, and whether there are some strange creatures is still a mystery to be explored.

You can take a bus directly from Chongqing to Fengjie, or you can take a bus to Wanzhou and then take a speedboat to Fengjie, and then take a bus from Fengjie to Tiankeng Sew 1 hour (every hour from 6 am to 4 am). From Enshi, it is ok to have a car from 06.00 to 15.00 triangle dam or Fengjie, and you can also go to Sobuya along the way.

The above content is taken from Baidu Encyclopedia. I am from Fengjie Triangle Dam in Chongqing. The above contents are true and effective.

The magic yurt reading answer 1,

Green lasts forever, and thousands of miles of green flow.

2、

Dozens of polished wooden sticks with the same thickness are connected together with cowhide ropes, which is a retractable mesh bracket.

An umbrella-shaped roof support supported by wooden sticks. Specific appellation

3、

The biggest advantage of yurts is that they are easy to disassemble and move.

Compare figures with examples.