1069 is the collection message true?

Information like this 1069 has been piled up in my mobile phone from the first day of forced overdue forced login to the present three months. There are many kinds, such as prosecution, door-to-door, going to the village Committee, and credit information being affected and threatened.

So when you receive the short message of notification of litigation from 1069, the other party says that Tan Blind will sue you, so does this information hold?

Let's popularize this problem for everyone.

The litigation notice and short message of 1069 have no legal effect most of the time, because if the platform sues you to the court, the court will call the parties to get it. If the phone call is not in place, it will be notified by email in person.

If there is falsehood, there must be truth, so under what circumstances is it true?

General 12368 is the main case filed by the court, not 1069, so we should pay attention to and actively deal with the information received from 12368. As for the litigation information and notices received by 1069, these are just the psychological pressure exerted on you by the platform. They are just a means of collection. The purpose is to put pressure on you, let you in, and let you try your best to pay back the money as soon as possible. Only by paying back the money can he finish the task.

If you can't confirm the authenticity, you must go to the official channel to check whether the case is really filed.