What is the final verdict of the case of Glory Company v. an evaluation blogger for infringement of reputation?

What is the final verdict of the case of Glory Company v. an evaluation blogger for infringement of reputation? Let's discuss this problem below, hoping that these contents can help friends in need.

Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court issued a document, and Glory Company sued an evaluation blogger for infringing the right of reputation, and the evaluation blogger paid Glory Company 86,698 yuan.

It is understood that Xiaojiang (pen name) is a Weibo plus V user with 65,438+10,000 fans. The user name is Xiaojiang Appraisal (pen name), and Weibo's account number is verified as "Digital Blogger". From February to May, 2002/kloc-0, Xiao Jiang published a series of comments on several digital products, such as Glory V40, Play5t, Panda Kaikai 20 and its x7 tablet, in his Weibo.

Glory Terminal Equipment Comparison Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Glory Company) believes that Xiaojiang is well-known in the digital circle network, and its continuous publication of defamatory and defamatory content of glory goods has seriously infringed on the reputation right of Glory Company, so it appealed to the people's court, demanding Xiaojiang to immediately delete the infringing content involved, apologize and compensate for property losses of 6.5438+0 million yuan and effective consumer rights protection expenses of 76,698 yuan.

During the trial, Xiao Jiang decided that he had not made a specific evaluation of the above-mentioned glory goods in Weibo. The first-instance judgment of Guangzhou Internet Court: Xiao Jiang announced an apology statement at the top of the homepage of his Weibo account, apologizing to Glory Company, clearing the injury for Glory Company and clarifying the facts; Xiaojiang paid property loss of 60,000 yuan and effective expenses of 26,698 yuan to Glory Company, totaling 86,698 yuan; Reject the appeal and respect the company's other claims.

Later, no prosecution was brought against the other party, and the judgment has taken effect. According to Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court, Xiaojiang is a customer of Weibo Plus V, with more than 65,438+million fans. He is an active customer in Weibo, and Weibo has been verified as a "digital blogger". The information content of digital products released by him in Weibo will attract the attention of fans or other Internet customers.

When Xiao Jiang released the abridged Weibo, he did not show the full text in detail and objectively, but deliberately pieced together comments from other users. He could selectively introduce defamatory views into the abridged article.

Besides, there is no objective basis for Weibo's original design. As a "digital blogger", Xiao Jiang's Weibo views on digital goods were not published through his own evaluation or feelings about the equipment, nor were they properly verified.