Electronic delivery to the parties will not, but will it be possible to deliver it in writing?

The detailed analysis of the written delivery form is as follows: 1. The form of written service is generally direct service.

2, written service, refused by the addressee, can be served by lien.

3, direct delivery is difficult, you can entrust the relevant agencies to serve.

4. Delivery by post.

5. If the addressee's whereabouts are unknown or cannot be served by other means, it may be served by public announcement.

Judicial interpretation of civil litigation: Article 261 When a case is tried by summary procedure, the people's court may summon both parties, notify witnesses and serve litigation documents other than the judgment documents by means of telegram, telephone, short message, fax or e-mail.

Electronic service should follow the principle of voluntary participation of the parties:

The adoption of electronic delivery requires the consent of the parties, but the confirmation method agreed by the parties must be written or oral. It is not clear whether to adopt the electronic delivery confirmation form alone, directly add the electronic delivery option to the confirmation of the delivery address, or other ways.

In practice, some courts independently customize the format of electronic service confirmation, some add a column of "Agree to electronic service" in the confirmation of service address, and some record the e-mail address or fax number of the parties in the court trial transcript, which is regarded as confirmation by the signature of the parties. These practices are different and lack legal dignity. There is an urgent need for the Supreme Court to issue relevant judicial interpretations and local implementation rules as soon as possible to unify them.