Is the information sent by 1069 really a means of prosecution or collection?

Is the court news at the beginning of 1069 true?

Generally speaking, it is not credible, because if the platform sues the defaulting user to the court, the court will ask the parties to collect it. If the call is not connected, it will be delivered by hand or by mail. Secondly, even if you send a notification message, the filing message should be 12368.

Therefore, in this case, it is considered that the platform sent it to scare the debtor and put psychological pressure on it. If the user can't confirm, he can go to the official channel to ask if the case has really been filed.

Of course, Xi Cai Jun doesn't suggest that users don't have to deal with similar messages. As long as the overdue situation of users is true, they may be sued, which will have a negative impact. If you are willing to repay but unable to repay, it is suggested to negotiate with the platform before the court session to show your repayment difficulties and determination, then there is still a chance to deal with it.

The above is Xi Cai Jun's opinion on "Is it credible to receive the short message from 1069?" . Generally speaking, the user needs to confirm the receipt of this short message. The basic confirmation is false and is urged by the platform. And if it is really filed, it will usually be notified by phone, in person or by email. Generally speaking, the short message of 1069 litigation notice is not credible, because if the platform sues the user who owes money to the court, the court will call the party to ask for it. If the call is not connected, it will be notified by face-to-face delivery and mail delivery. The text message for filing a case by the court is 12368, not 1069.

Please click to enter the picture description (maximum 18 words).

1069 is it true that online loans are overdue and will be prosecuted?

First of all, you can be sure that the collection messages starting with 1069 are generally true. Because the number starting with 1069 is very common in commercial SMS platforms, based on the three major operators, it is easy to realize SMS group sending through the Internet and big data. Therefore, the collection message at the beginning of 1069 is also commonly used by large and small lending institutions.

Secondly, we should understand that a lender who says that he wants to sue is not the same as one who has already sued. If the short message at the beginning of 1069 tells the institution that the borrower has been sued, it is nine times out of ten to scare the borrower to achieve the purpose of urging him to pay back the arrears. Because once a lawsuit is filed, the court will inform the borrower of the summons by mail or telephone as soon as possible.

The state has very strict supervision over the collection of small loans, especially the prohibition of violent collection. In the case of limited means, the collector will choose to pretend to sue the borrower in the short message content to scare the borrower. If the borrower is really uneasy, he can also choose to find official website in the local court to inquire about the specific situation. If there is a case number, it means that the borrower has indeed been sued. If not, it means that the prosecution is nonsense.

1069 is the collection message true?

Information like this 1069 has been piled up in my mobile phone from the first day of forced overdue forced login to the present three months. There are many kinds, such as prosecution, door-to-door, going to the village Committee, and credit information being affected and threatened.

So when you receive the short message of notification of litigation from 1069, the other party says that Tan Blind will sue you, so does this information hold?

Let's popularize this problem for everyone.

The litigation notice and short message of 1069 have no legal effect most of the time, because if the platform sues you to the court, the court will call the parties to get it. If the phone call is not in place, it will be notified by email in person.

If there is falsehood, there must be truth, so under what circumstances is it true?

General 12368 is the main case filed by the court, not 1069, so we should pay attention to and actively deal with the information received from 12368. As for the litigation information and notices received by 1069, these are just the psychological pressure exerted on you by the platform. They are just a means of collection. The purpose is to put pressure on you, let you in, and let you try your best to pay back the money as soon as possible. Only by paying back the money can he finish the task.

If you can't confirm the authenticity, you must go to the official channel to check whether the case is really filed.

1069 is it true that the text message at the beginning said that you would sue me?

Generally speaking, the short message of 1069 litigation notice is not credible, because if the platform sues the user who owes money to the court, the court will call the party to ask for it. If the call is not connected, it will be notified by face-to-face delivery and mail delivery. The text message for filing a case by the court is 12368, not 1069.

Therefore, if you receive the short message of 1069 litigation notice, you will think that it is sent by the platform to scare the debtor and exert psychological pressure on him. If the user can't confirm, he can go to the official channel to ask if it has really been filed. Of course, if you are really overdue, I suggest you pay back as soon as possible.

Litigation refers to the form in which both parties to a dispute solve their disputes by suing each other in a court with jurisdiction. It is a legal act, which is divided into three categories: administrative, civil and criminal. Administrative litigation is commonly known as "people's accusation" litigation, and a large number of civil procedure laws apply. In civil litigation, the plaintiff is the victim, and because there are unresolved disputes, he resorts to the law. Criminal proceedings involve criminal offences, and the government authorities accuse the suspects.

Chinese mainland's proceedings generally adopt the system of two trials as the final instance (pay attention to the change of words, two trials are not equal to the second instance), which is divided into first instance and second instance, but some cases take the first instance as the final instance. For example, Article 162 of the new Civil Procedure Law stipulates that "if the basic people's courts and the courts dispatched by them try simple civil cases that conform to the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 157 of this Law, and the amount of the subject matter is less than 30% of the average annual salary of employees in various provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the final judgment of first instance shall be executed."

In the western concept, litigation refers to the process or procedure that the court handles cases and disputes; In the concept of China people, the word "litigation" consists of two words: litigation and litigation. "Litigation" means telling, telling, informing and accusing, and "litigation" means arguing and judging right and wrong. Together, the two words mean telling the court, arguing in court, and debating the merits. If the word "litigation" is defined from the legal point of view, it can be simply summarized as follows: litigation is the activity of special state organs to solve specific cases in accordance with legal authority and procedures with the participation of litigation participants.