Why doesn’t iPhone 12 add fingerprint unlocking?

Starting from the iPhone As for why Apple is so willful that it directly cuts off fingerprint unlocking and only supports face unlocking? I think there are several reasons. First, fingerprint unlocking takes up too much space and does not conform to the beauty of the design

Now is the era of full screens. The higher the front screen-to-body ratio, the better. iPhones have always liked to set fingerprint unlocking on the home button. . Now due to the impact of the trend of full-screen mobile phones, the home button of the iPhone has been cancelled. If the fingerprint unlocking is set to the back of the iPhone, it will affect the Apple logo on the back of the iPhone, and it will also affect the design of the back of the iPhone. Apple The designer just cut off the fingerprint unlocking. Second, Apple’s technical confidence

Many domestic mobile phone manufacturers also support both fingerprint unlocking and face unlocking under the trend of the pandemic. Few mobile phone manufacturers dare not directly eliminate fingerprint unlocking and only support face unlocking. Support face unlock for the following reasons:

However, Apple is very confident in face unlock. Although Apple had an overturn in face unlocking at the launch of the first-generation iPhone Moreover, based on my own experience of using face unlock on iPhones for several years, I have almost never had any mistakes. This is technical confidence! Third, face unlocking is more convenient than fingerprint unlocking

This point is for iPhones. I believe that many iPhone users have already experienced the speed and accuracy of face unlocking on iPhones. Take it from your pocket Come out - automatically light up the screen - unlock, the whole process is done in one go. Both the unlocking speed and the unlocking accuracy are very fast. In the past few years, my experience with face unlocking has been that there have been no mistakes. Otherwise, iPhone users would have complained and abandoned it long ago. Fourth, the number of reservations for the iPhone 12 series proves the acceptance of face unlocking

The number of reservations for the iPhone 12 series on JD.com’s self-operated e-commerce platform alone is close to 1.5 million, which is enough to show the popularity of the iPhone 12 series , and also shows that iPhone users recognize that the iPhone only supports face unlocking, and they do not care whether fingerprint unlocking can assist unlocking.

Recently, starting with the iPhone 12 series of mobile phones, Apple has begun selling mobile phones that no longer come with headphones and charging heads. This has been hotly discussed by netizens, and the iPhone’s response is for environmental protection. We also hope that other mobile phone manufacturers will follow suit. Apple has been leading the way since Steve Jobs, using technology to lead the entire mobile phone industry. Today, Apple still has a proud pedigree!

Even many people who use iPhones think that they have proud and unique capital. Since the launch of full-screen iPhones, there has been no fingerprint unlocking on the iPhone A series of fingerprint unlocking solutions, including back fingerprint unlocking, side fingerprint unlocking, and under-screen fingerprint unlocking that are currently popular among major mobile phone manufacturers!

In itself, under-screen fingerprint unlocking is a very good solution for full-screen, but the iPhone does not use back fingerprint unlocking on iPhone , if the iPhone is equipped with fingerprint unlocking at this time, it will not be possible on the back, because the back is too unsightly, and this is what Apple does not want to see.

If the under-screen fingerprint unlocking solution is used, many people will probably say that Apple imitates Android phones, which is contrary to Apple's reputation value!

Although Apple has begun to learn some layouts and other aspects of Android in the interface over the years, it has always adhered to its own concepts in the appearance of mobile phones. This time the iPhone12 series has also changed the sleek and elegant design. , adopting the tough cutting design before iPhone5s, this is also the design style introduced by Steve Jobs starting from iPhone4! It is also loved by fruit fans.

Perhaps Apple hopes to stimulate the hearts of many users of older mobile phones by remembering the tycoon design of the iPhone 5s. It hopes that the iPhone will return part of the design so that many users can easily fall in love with the iPhone. This is also a way of besieging Wei and saving Zhao. strategy, but there is still no way to see how much progress Apple has made in appearance design. It is more of its own design language! So some people just said, why else, it’s just to save costs! The iPhone hopes to save some costs and lower the price of mobile phones, so as to have better pricing space in the mobile phone market and truly compete with the Android series mobile phones. I think it still makes sense!

Why doesn’t iPhone 12 add fingerprint unlocking? Not only does the iPhone 12 not have fingerprint unlocking, Apple has used facial recognition to unlock it since it released the iPhone Unlocking (Touch ID) all uses the face unlocking (Face ID) solution. However, there is news that the next generation iPhone 13 will add fingerprint unlocking again, and it will still be the under-screen fingerprint unlocking method commonly used in Android phones. Biometric technology

As an advanced identity verification method, biometric technology is widely used in many fields such as finance, information security, and telecommunications. Currently, there are two main types of mobile phone biometric technologies: fingerprint recognition and face recognition. Since iPhone X was equipped with Face ID, facial recognition technology was once considered to be the future development direction, and fingerprint payment will gradually be eliminated. Why? Why did Apple cancel fingerprint unlocking and use face recognition unlocking?

Fingerprint recognition technology has undergone years of iterative development. At the current stage, the mainstream fingerprint technologies mainly include capacitive fingerprint technology, optical under-screen fingerprint technology and ultrasonic under-screen fingerprint technology. But before face recognition technology was used in mobile phones, traditional fingerprint technology used capacitive fingerprint technology.

Why does Apple use face recognition to unlock? First of all, Face ID is a facial recognition technology developed and designed by Apple itself, which is more secure than fingerprint recognition technology. Second, it is more convenient to use face recognition to unlock. Users only need to light up the screen and face it to unlock. Third, Apple carried out differentiated marketing. At that time, smartphones generally used capacitive fingerprint unlocking. If Apple used face recognition to unlock, there would be more differences compared with other mobile phone brands. For users, face recognition would be the key to unlocking. It also sounds very high-tech and cool. iPhone 13 is very likely to add an under-screen fingerprint unlocking function

With the popularity of the concept of full-screen mobile phones, current mainstream Android phones have begun to adopt under-screen fingerprint unlocking solutions. Under-screen fingerprint recognition technology is a technology that enables fingerprint unlocking under the screen glass. Apple is very likely to add an under-screen fingerprint unlocking function to the next-generation iPhone 13.

It is reported that Apple has obtained a new patent for a new type of optical under-screen fingerprint recognition technology. In this year's COVID-19 epidemic, facial recognition unlocking has an obvious shortcoming, that is, the user needs to take off the mask before facial recognition can be unlocked. This year's iPhone 12 was designed before the COVID-19 pandemic, so it didn't take this special situation into consideration. Therefore, under-screen fingerprint unlocking may appear on the next generation iPhone and be used together with face-scanning unlocking.

Why use under-screen fingerprint instead of voltage fingerprint?

Because most mobile phones currently have full screens, and full screens are also a major trend in the development of mobile phones. Because of the characteristics of capacitive fingerprint unlocking, a "home" button is required, and this button will occupy the position below the screen, restricting the size of the display, and is not in line with the trend of full-screen, but this does not exist with the under-screen fingerprint method. Disadvantages: It is in line with the trend of full screen. Conclusion Text | Technical Yuan Xiaohuang Pictures | From the Internet

The answer to why not add fingerprint unlocking is obvious, because whether to add it or not, you should buy what you should buy. To put it bluntly, you are used to it.

So many answers can already explain the problem. No matter how good Apple is, a group of people will come out to clean up the problem. The headphone charger can be omitted. Isn’t it reasonable to not add a screen? Or do some people really think that not sending a charger is for environmental protection?

Facial recognition is indeed good, but it also has limitations. For example, it is easy to fail to unlock when you just wake up with a disheveled face, and it is even more paralyzed after wearing a mask. Although the fingerprint under the screen is not as easy to use as the face, one more solution can solve the embarrassment when the face is struck, and the fingerprint under the screen is not limited to unlocking, but can also be used as a shortcut to quickly open wallets or other application functions, which is definitely beneficial. Harmless, the only drawback is the added cost to Apple.

All in all, no matter what Apple does, Apple fans will not care and will buy it anyway. So why should Apple bother and increase costs to cater to consumers?

Apple has always insisted on going its own way. On Android phones, the solution of face unlocking + fingerprint unlocking has long been implemented and is very mature. Why does the iPhone always miss out on fingerprint unlocking? Let’s analyze it from several starting points. 1. Cost factor

Once the iPhone 12 was released, the behavior of "not distributing chargers" was criticized. It was called for the sake of environmental protection, but in the final analysis it was still a cost issue.

Apple is a company that is very good at "living life". It will definitely not take out things that it deems unnecessary. Anyway, it saves money. It doesn't matter whether users can accept it. I think in my heart, "You guys Adapt to the iPhone, not let the iPhone adapt to you."

The fingerprint unlocking function has long been mature. Apple is definitely capable of integrating this function under the screen. Unfortunately, the iPhone only supports face unlocking and conventional unlocking methods. Whether it is for environmental protection or to save money, analyze it yourself. . 2. Security factors

There are endless cracking methods for fingerprint unlocking. The "cracking device" has been broken by people for a long time. In the past, it could be easily bought online. Now it seems that it cannot be found, but if you want to buy it, you can It’s not difficult. Just like e-cigarettes, if they are not allowed to be sold online, will they be unavailable? A truth.

To a certain extent, fingerprint unlocking is indeed not as safe as face unlocking, but depending on the situation, iPhone face unlocking is quite safe. At least I haven’t heard of any problems with the iPhone’s face.

Apple has always attached great importance to the "security and privacy" issue of mobile phones, and the same applies to unlocking methods. Although the current fingerprint unlocking is also very mature, in the eyes of Apple, it is unsafe. Combined with the above mentioned Regarding the "cost issue", I am also dubious about Apple's remarks. 3. Brand factors

Apple mobile phones were once a model that Android phones tried to imitate. Nowadays, they are surpassed in terms of functionality. Even if I feel uncomfortable, I cannot let go of my pride and make some differences in some places. In order to highlight the "personality".

First, we gave up the headphone jack, then we gave up fingerprint unlocking, and this time we gave up the charger plug. Continuous subtraction can be said to have advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is to save layer costs, and the disadvantage is that users suffer losses, but Apple does this because it is Apple, a brand that is particularly proud of.

Some of Apple’s actions can be said to be quite willful, but the IOS system and ecosystem and A-series chips give Apple the qualification to do things that Android machines dare not do. After all, from the system and chip These two important components of mobile phones are absolutely different from Android phones, which is why Apple dares to be so unscrupulous. Preliminary predictions are that in the future, iPhone will not even send packaging boxes, and there will be a lot of people to support it. I Said.

Summary

The reason why iPhone 12 did not consider user demands and add fingerprint unlocking is firstly due to cost reasons, secondly due to security reasons, and thirdly due to brand reasons. Generally speaking, it is spoiled, and 90% of the world’s smartphones The above profits have been earned by Apple and Samsung. What does this mean? Is it because they are large in quantity? No! It's because they are ruthless enough. It's a typical businessman's thinking, not a compliment.

It’s because under-screen fingerprints will increase the cost of Apple phones! Sell ??it at a good price and no one will buy it! Is it embarrassing to say that the technology is immature? Don’t wear a mask to unlock the screen with a fingerprint when going out during this year’s epidemic. It’s too convenient! ! ! Who took off the mask and scanned their face for a long time! Also, the probability of Apple's face scanning device being broken is too high. Too many of them cannot be recognized because the recognition success rate has dropped after the phone was dropped! And it’s not cheap to replace it!

Just look at Android. Unless the tempered film is not attached. With the edge glue tempered film affixed, the fingerprints under the screen are no longer visible. It's the same whether there is or not. Don't talk about the soft film, it is difficult to use but not useful. PS: I have an m30p now, so I can experience it myself. Now I use the edge-adhesive tempered film, and then reverse it to brighten the screen on the face. The disadvantage is that the screen will light up when I wipe the phone. I used a soft film before, and it was easy to use with fingerprints, but it was uncomfortable to use. And once I dropped it on the ground and smashed several small spots on the screen directly through the film. (There is also a UV tempered film. It is a fully laminated tempered film. The film seems to need to be irradiated by ultraviolet light. This has no effect, but after the film is broken, it will also need to be irradiated with ultraviolet light before it can be removed. It is too troublesome for a careless person like me)

Because facial recognition is easier to use

Because we don’t want to increase costs

Fingerprint unlocking technology suitable for full-screen displays is not yet mature. Please refer to the current situation of Android under-screen fingerprint unlocking. The experience is still not good enough.