What are the advantages and disadvantages of inviting tenders?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of inviting tenders? Invited bidding for construction, also known as limited competitive bidding, refers to the bidding method in which the tenderee of the construction unit selects several (not less than three) suppliers or contractors according to their credit standing and performance, sends them invitations to bid, invites suppliers or contractors of construction enterprises to bid for competition, and selects the winning bidder from them.

1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of inviting tenders?

Advantages:

Public bidding has great advantages in openness and wide competition, but it also has some defects. For example, due to the large number of bidders, it usually takes a long time and costs a lot. For the tender with smaller procurement target, it is often not worth the loss. In addition, some projects are very professional, and there are few potential bidders who are qualified to undertake them, or the procurement task needs to be completed in a short time, so it is not appropriate to adopt public bidding. Invitation to bid can make up for these defects to some extent, and at the same time, it can give full play to the advantages of project bidding.

Disadvantages:

1, "people-oriented" is more. First, it is difficult for other potential suppliers to participate in the competition, and the number of suppliers to be invited is determined by the leaders of the bidding unit or the bidding agency; The second is to help relatives and friends. The tenderer thinks: "Fat water does not flow from outsiders"; 3. The tenderer has a poor sense of confidentiality. Vendors with "evil thoughts" tell the whole story of suppliers participating in the competition by saying a few good words or a little benefit, which provides information for their collusion.

2. Site reconnaissance and bid preparation will be the liaison meeting accompanying the bid. Some suppliers pay attention to the conversation during the on-site investigation and drawing answering agreed by the tenderer. Only 3-4 suppliers are familiar with it. In a county 1 1 collusion punishment cases, 9 cases were connected at the Q&A meeting.

3. The intermediary whitewashes it. Some bidding agencies cultivate "three" bidding circles, as long as the three projects they represent win the bid in turn; Some are at the mercy of tenderers or bidders, helping them forge documents and materials to avoid examination and filing by regulatory authorities; When formulating bid evaluation methods, we should weigh the scores around the qualifications and performance of suitable candidates; Secretly give the pre-tender estimate to the right person and make a profit from it.

4. There are various ways to accompany bidding. Improving the winning rate is the goal pursued by suppliers. In the long-term running-in process, in order to improve efficiency and reduce the cost of bidding, suppliers gradually use the "blame theory" to accompany each other: First, regional bidding. Those from other places accompany the local ones, and in the end, the local unit always wins the bid; The second is to attach the attached tender. There are 1, 2, and 3 blocks in one bid section, one of which is main and the other is foil. Whoever wins the bid will win the bid. The third is to form an alliance to accompany the bid. You accompany me once, I will accompany you once, and we won't blame each other. The economic exchanges in the bidding process are "small money", and all parties are fragmented, leaving no sequelae and no evidence for the regulatory authorities to investigate.

For more information about bid writing and improving the winning rate, click on the bottom customer service for free consultation.