Debate Competition: Advantages and Disadvantages of Information Exchange?

The teacher asked me to write the opposite, so I only have arguments that will not enhance my understanding. I really hate copying and pasting answers. I hope it will help the subject.

1, modern information exchange is shallow, too indifferent to express feelings, only to be caring and attentive, and unable to give people real and effective communication.

With the explosion of modern information, the weight of words is decreasing.

3. Information exchange needs harsh conditions, which is not as effective as face-to-face expression.

4. Long-term information exchange may lose the original way of communication.

5. Due to the anonymity of the Internet, the evil of human nature has surfaced, making it difficult to provide effective help and easy to hurt people. In real communication, because of the open identity, it is not easy to export foul language.

The development of mobile phones, computers and other network communication methods has brought a lot of convenience to our lives, but people never thought that when information communication methods became popular, there were more and more problems.

Information exchange, perhaps voice or text, is not as good as face-to-face communication. In face-to-face communication, you can feel the other person's expression, tone, language and body movements, and in face-to-face communication with strangers, you can also make yourself not shy or stage fright. So it has many advantages.

Every morning, a lot of news in friends circle and QQ group is disgusting, but this kind of news is not as good as in real life. Friends can send messages all the time, and time is limited. And some messages are time-sensitive, while others are meaningless. If you mix them together, you need to read them one by one. In this era of information explosion, how much effective information is there? Some people even praise and reply one by one in order to consolidate friendship. In reality, we can convey our feelings to each other by body language, expression and tone, but in the internet age, it has become a single praise and reply, which naturally leads to anxiety on both sides. "Why don't you praise me today? Don't you like me? " With the acceleration of the pace of life, the efficiency of unit time is getting higher and higher, and the unfinished things in the heart are increasing, which increases people's pressure and information gradually loses its original meaning. Long-term social interaction without normal physical communication leads to social phobia. Why do people still indulge in their own fantasy "Utopia"?

The emergence of terms such as "spray", "lever essence", "batch of teenagers" and "stalk boy" symbolizes that the Internet is no longer pure. "At the beginning of life, inherent vice" never lacked the animal side of human beings. It is the goodness of human nature that inhibits the evil of animal nature, which leads to the harmony of human society. The anonymity of the network makes the other party not know who you are, and it is difficult to avoid your information, which makes the dark side of human nature fully displayed. Accusing and judging, asking for a big V, maliciously brushing low scores, even maliciously reporting, human flesh search ... Many people have a weak legal awareness in order to achieve their own goals, which creates the illusion that the network is not bound by the rule of law and moral standards and stirs up the whole Internet. With the increase of the number of people surfing the Internet, it is easy to get together without thinking when encountering problems. People's group correct instinct and mob effect make everyone's individual IQ lower, and it is easy to produce black-and-white remarks. And if you do something wrong, you don't need to apologize or reply. In such a big environment, is the information exchange really as beautiful as the square imagined? How many people have something to say without knowing the truth? How many people are known to have ulterior motives How much information is one-sided? How many media are concerned about the truth?

The network is by no means pure land. Let's go back to the original language communication, put down those gossip about right and wrong, and start our interpersonal life again.

(ps: the teacher asked me to write an argumentative paper, and so did the main debate)

179