Hangzhou man express shows that it has been signed but not received. Does the courier have the right to sign for the user's courier?

Hangzhou men's express shows that they have signed for it, but they have not received it. The courier has no right to sign for the user's courier, thinking that most couriers can't be delivered to customers in time, but we have to deliver them. Sometimes there are many special circumstances, customers will ask the courier to sign for it, but for most people, such things may be less, but there are indeed many couriers who have not received the goods but have signed for them. There are many such situations around us, but if we can strengthen the supervision of the express delivery industry, it may not happen, because such a situation is really unacceptable to us.

Some couriers regard their own behavior as a better way, but for customers, such behavior has seriously violated the interests of customers. For Hu customers, all logistics information is displayed there regardless of whether there is express delivery or not, and customers simply don't know where their express delivery is.

For most people, such a rise is an infringement on themselves. We are rather picky about such behavior. Can you make the express delivery industry less like this? In fact, such a thing will only increase our time and can't really solve the problem.

Sometimes we really don't care much about such things, but if we buy high-value things, then this is definitely not enough, because most people will definitely not think of such things in a positive way, but more of an infringement on their own rights and interests. For men in Hangzhou, couriers have no right to sign for users' express delivery, because such things are actually just our own behaviors and feelings, and for couriers privately.