The seriousness of the notice of inquiry from the discipline inspection team

Conversation and inquiry is a common way for the Commission for Discipline Inspection to deal with problems and clues, and it is also a means for the discipline inspection organization to grasp the minor problems that may exist in party member cadres early and remind them to help. However, in reality, some cadres in party member don't know enough about the conversation and inquiry, and they either take it seriously or deal with it in a perfunctory way, or they are lucky enough to fight against the organization, or they have other misunderstandings.

1. The work rules of supervision and discipline are clearly stipulated, such as Article 25: "After preliminary verification, if there is a serious violation of discipline and it is necessary to investigate the party discipline responsibility, it shall be filed for review.

2. Conversation and inquiry are serious ideological and political work, and you must never go through the motions if you really want to have the effect of blushing and sweating.

3. If you don't take the initiative to explain yourself, the organization will verify the problem clearly through in-depth understanding, which will be completely different in nature and will be a different way to deal with it.

Analysis of the problems and countermeasures in the work of conversation and correspondence is as follows:

1. Problems

Conversation and correspondence is a new means of supervision and discipline, and it is also the most widely used way for discipline inspection and supervision organs at all levels to deal with four kinds of clues. At present, there is little theoretical research on conversation and correspondence, and everyone is crossing the river by feeling for the stones. There are still many disputes in practical work, mainly four problems.

(1) Based on experience, it is difficult to accurately grasp which problem clues are handled by conversation and inquiry.

At present, the discipline supervision department at or above the municipal level generally undertakes the investigation of problem clues, and there is no clear definition of what kind of object and what kind of problem clues should be interviewed.

Article 22 of the Measures for Supervision, Discipline Inspection and Supervision of Discipline Inspection and Supervision Organs in Yunnan Province (Trial) stipulates six types of problem clues that should not be handled by conversation and inquiry, and adopts the method of exclusion to stipulate the problem clues that cannot be handled by conversation and inquiry.

In reality, conversation and inquiry are often put forward by the undertaking department after analysis and judgment based on experience. For more general or difficult-to-verify clues, most of them are handled by conversation and inquiry, and in reality, inaccurate grasp often occurs.

(2) understatement, it is difficult to know the real situation in conversation and letter inquiry

What to talk about and ask in letter is still being explored in practice. Some incipient and tendentious problems can be clearly pointed out and reminded without involving specific problems, and the object can be asked to explain. However, for some specific problems, they may be taken lightly by the object in the process of conversation and inquiry < P > For some serious violations of discipline and law, the other party may remedy them in time, but the conversation and inquiry tells the other party what clues the discipline inspection and supervision organs have mastered in disguise, which makes it difficult to carry out the follow-up investigation and verification. In reality, many people who have been reflected still ignore the important questions and answer irrelevant questions, only talking about achievements and objective factors, not talking about subjectivity and specific issues, which makes it difficult to achieve the expected results in practical work.

At the same time, relying on written materials or conversation materials for settlement, relying too much on and trusting the reflected person makes it difficult for the disciplinary means of conversation and inquiry to play an effective role.

(3) There are many staff involved in the process, and there are problems in the confidentiality of cases

As an important way to supervise the discipline work, the conversation and inquiry work involves many departments and personnel, such as the petition and case management departments of the discipline inspection and supervision organs to handle clues, and send letters to the reflected people and the party committees (party groups) and discipline inspection committees (discipline inspection teams) of their units through the office, and then send them back to the discipline inspection and supervision organs after endorsement and signature, so there are too many handlers.

If the inquiry is turned to preliminary verification through conversation, it will greatly increase the difficulty of handling the case.

(4) Good people are prominent in their thoughts, and their signatures and endorsements are a mere formality

The purpose of conversation and inquiry is to put discipline ahead and pass on the idea of "saving lives by treating diseases" to the interviewees, so as to restore a good inner-party political ecology, protect the health of the whole "forest" and truly reflect the strict requirements and care for party member.

In this process, the responsibilities of the party committees and discipline inspection committees (discipline inspection teams) who have been interviewed are clarified and strengthened, forming a virtuous circle of concerted efforts and implementation at all levels, and transmitting the pressure of "two responsibility". In the process of conversation and inquiry, the party organization and discipline inspection commission (discipline inspection group) of the unit must carefully review, endorse and sign, and reply to the discipline inspection commission according to the time requirement.

However, in actual work, the leaders of the Party organizations and the leaders of the Discipline Inspection Commission (Discipline Inspection Commission) who endorse and sign still have the idea of "being a good old man" to a certain extent, and they think that the problem is not particularly serious and they can cope with the past. They have not carefully examined the explanations and evidence materials of the interviewees, and failed to give full play to the main responsibility of the Party Committee (Party Group) in managing the party and the supervisory responsibility of the Discipline Inspection Commission (Discipline Inspection Commission).

Legal basis:

Regulations on Inner-Party Supervision of China * * * Production Party

Article 7 Inner-party supervision must put discipline ahead, use the "four forms" of supervision and discipline, and often carry out criticism and self-criticism, interviews and letters, so that "blushing and sweating" become the norm; Disciplinary punishment and organizational adjustment have become the majority of disciplinary actions; The party discipline has been severely punished and major job adjustments have become a minority; Serious violations of discipline and suspected illegal filing for review have become very few.

article 2 the party's organizational life system should be strictly enforced, and democratic life meetings should be held regularly, and important or universal issues should be convened in time. Democratic life will focus on solving outstanding problems. At the meeting, leading cadres should clearly and thoroughly explain the problems reflected by the masses, patrol feedback and organization of interviews and letters, carry out criticism and self-criticism, put forward rectification measures, and accept organizational supervision. Party organizations at higher levels should strengthen the guidance and supervision of the democratic life meeting of the leading bodies at lower levels and improve the quality of the democratic life meeting.

article 31 when receiving a reflection on the general violation of discipline by cadres, they should seek personal verification in time, talk to remind them, make interviews and make inquiries, and let the cadres explain the problem clearly. Interviews with the person being reflected can be conducted together with the main person in charge of the party organization where they belong; The explanation given by the respondent to the inquiry should be signed by the principal responsible person of the party organization where it belongs and reported to the higher commission for discipline inspection. Conversation record and the reply to the inquiry should be carefully verified and filed for future reference. If no problems are found, they should be settled and clarified, and those who do not truthfully explain the situation should be dealt with severely.