The reporter of Simba selling fake bird's nest was attacked by the internet. Should the anchor be responsible for the products he sells?

The matter of Simba's Bird's Nest is still raging on the Internet. Guangzhou regulatory authorities have investigated the fake bird's nest incident in Simba, and now this matter has started to make waves again. According to the news, the female netizen who first voiced this incident was subjected to cyber violence. Many netizens spoke on her account, fearing that she would be cursed and kept her from going out for more than a month.

In fact, the matter of Simba's bird's nest originated from a female netizen who bought this product in Simba's live broadcast room. After using it, she posted a video on her short video in which she talked about the bird's nest sold by Simba. ? Is this the Bird's Nest? Isn't this all water? ? This short video was quickly reprinted by many people, and the number of hits was also high. Many netizens left messages on his account, claiming that she came to Zimbabwe and her information was exposed. Many people call and send text messages to harass her and threaten her.

In fact, it was because of the video exposure of female netizens that the fake doctor Dr. Wang Hai noticed this matter. He also noticed the information about this product. The product ingredients in this product do not contain protein at all, so he has determined that this product does not have bird's nest at all. Later, he took this product to test and confirmed that the main component of this product is caramel, and the cost of the whole product did not exceed one yuan at all.

With the rise of the live broadcast industry, many people have joined the live broadcast industry and started selling products with goods. But this is a new industry, and there are still many defects in supervision. Therefore, many criminals use this method to sell fakes to consumers. Then if there is a product quality problem during the live sale, the anchor also needs to bear the corresponding responsibility. Zhao Zhanling, deputy director of Beijing Zhi Lin Law Firm, believes that if the anchor is also a store operator, then the live content is equivalent to an advertisement, and false propaganda is unfair competition and needs to bear legal responsibility; If the anchor only promotes on his behalf, his identity is equivalent to that of an advertising spokesperson, and false propaganda also needs to bear joint and several liability.