If you owe money to send a message, won't the other party count as evidence?

Legal analysis: owing money to send a message and the other party does not reply cannot be considered as evidence. It cannot be used as evidence that both parties have creditor's rights and debts, but as evidence that one party claims creditor's rights and debts, the statute of limitations is useful. In principle, using WeChat to send a message to the debtor, even if the other party does not reply, it already has the conditions to inform. Because it is impossible to confirm whether the other party has seen this message. Better have other evidence to prove it.

Legal Basis: Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Private Lending Cases Article 2 When a lender brings a private lending lawsuit to a people's court, it shall provide debt certificates such as IOUs, receipts and IOUs, as well as other evidence that can prove the existence of a legal relationship between lending and borrowing. If the creditor's rights certificate such as IOUs, receipts and IOUs held by the parties does not specify the creditor, and the party holding the creditor's rights certificate brings a private lending lawsuit, the people's court shall accept it. The defendant raised a factual defense against the plaintiff's creditor qualification, and the people's court ruled that the plaintiff did not have the creditor qualification after examination and dismissed the prosecution.