Iqiyi employees were awarded 1, yuan for leaving their jobs after they settled in Beijing. Why should employees leave their jobs and pay compensation to the company?

It is not the employees who claim compensation from the company, but the company demands compensation from the employees. The employees' behavior violates the principle of good faith and the contract. According to the contract, the court ruled that the employee should pay 1, yuan, which is no problem. However, if the government does not have relevant regulations on handling accounts in this case, it can continue to keep employees' Beijing accounts. Everyone knows the value of a Beijing hukou, so in fact, this employee exchanged 1, yuan for a Beijing hukou, and many people said that they benefited from it, which would cause problems. Some people might? Using loopholes? They can get a Beijing hukou when they go to work and get a Beijing hukou, which is very cost-effective. This is indeed a bad demonstration

but it is not easy to take advantage of the loopholes. After all, it is not easy to enter a unit in Beijing. This alone can screen out many people, and as an administrative act of the government, they can revoke their household registration unless it is illegal or even criminal. It is inappropriate to interfere excessively in civil acts such as contract breach. This is actually a contradiction, so can't this problem be solved? Actually, it isn't. On the one hand, large companies with quotas like this will sign contracts for their employees when they enter and settle down, and the service period has been agreed. The defaulter must bear certain liability for breach of contract. For example, employees of iQiyi lost 1, yuan. On the one hand, the household registration department can also improve relevant systems and regulations, and impose penalties such as revocation of household registration on some people who maliciously obtained Beijing household registration. This kind of thing not only tests laws and systems, but also tests human nature < P > Frankly speaking, it is still very cost-effective to spend 1, yuan to settle in Beijing. But this incident will also make some companies know that they need to strengthen management and control in the future, so that the rights and interests of people who are honest and trustworthy will be damaged. Sometimes this kind of thing is actually very difficult. Whether it is a company or an individual, we must achieve basic integrity, because once someone is dishonest, it may eventually harm the interests of others. Now the biggest problem in Beijing is to provide the household registration index to the department, and then the department user demographic index squeezes employees. In fact, we should have learned a long time ago that the right to settle down belongs to the government.

eligible people can go to government departments to settle down and bypass the unit. Mr. Peng's time from settling down to leaving his job is a bit short, and outsiders can't help but have ideas. Mr. Peng argued that his resignation was due to the unfair treatment of the company and had nothing to do with the settlement procedure. I don't know if Mr. Peng can prove that the company has been treated unfairly. Everyone also wants to know whether the work intensity of iQiyi employees has changed before and after. On the premise of the same salary, employees will have ideas if there is a big change. Of course, everything is based on evidence, and honesty should be the basis of one's work.