College students angrily called delivery workers "low-class pigs". Academic qualifications do not equal quality. Where does the confidence come from?

Does high academic qualifications mean high quality? In a general sense, this is true. For example, in our minds, college students are generally polite, gentle and elegant. But a piece of news some time ago somewhat overturned my understanding of college students. A college student in Ma'anshan, Anhui Province, angrily cursed the delivery boy? He is a bottom pig? Just because of the epidemic prevention and control, the delivery boy cannot enter the campus and can only call him. Students pick up meals at the school gate.

This college student felt that other delivery people could deliver food to the campus, but this delivery person deliberately made things difficult for him by letting him go out to pick up food. He cursed the delivery person and even made personal attacks. He didn’t stop there. After the service was over, I felt still upset, so I sent another text message to insult the delivery clerk, "low-class pig", "who has been a low-class person all his life, how does he look like a quality college student?" She is clearly a messy shrew!

Is a delivery person equal to the bottom? Statistics show that among the 7 million food delivery army, there are more than 70,000 master's students and 1.05 million undergraduates. After reading this data, I wonder if this "proud man of heaven" will still be so domineering. Maybe because it is very likely that after graduating from college, you will also join the food delivery army.

The reason why food delivery workers are considered to be at the "lower level" is because they work hard and are easily complained by customers, making them a vulnerable group. But their work does bring great convenience to our lives. There is no distinction between high and low in work. Why not earn remuneration through your own labor? Moreover, although the delivery boys work hard, they are much better than those college students who are unable to achieve a high level and end up just "gnawing at the old". What's more, the salary of a delivery boy is much higher than that of some college graduates who have just entered the society.

Those who ignore the hard work of others and bully the weak are the real "lower class". Even if they have a golden university diploma, they cannot cover up their ignorance and immorality. Such people will never be the same in the future. Go further because they have lost their character. Calling himself "Lao Tzu" and calling others "low-class pigs" and "lowest-class things". Anyone who speaks such language is a reflection of low quality.

In sharp contrast, when the insulted takeaway boy learned that the incident had attracted public attention and there were many criticisms of the college student on the Internet, he said: The other person is still a student, so I won’t argue with him, and I don’t want the students to be ruined because of this incident. In comparison, the difference between superiors and superiors is that maybe the deliveryman's diploma is not as high as that of a college student, and his economic conditions may not be as good as those of a college student, but his character and quality are more than one level higher than those of a college student!

This reminds me of the recent incident of Bao Moumou’s sexual assault of a minor that finally came to light. Although Bao Moumou was finally acquitted, the fact is that Chen Xingxing, who was doing misfortune online, was suspected of falsifying his age. Set up for blackmail. But is Bao really that innocent? The purpose of his adoption was not pure, he just wanted to adopt a minor to become his lover, but he fell into the trap of Chen Xingxing and his daughter.

A highly educated lawyer knows and breaks the law, adopts a young girl, and switches back and forth between the roles of father and fiancé, which is shocking. High education does not mean high quality. Talent but no virtue is far more harmful than one without talent and no virtue!

While our schools pay attention to the cultivation of students' knowledge, culture and learning ability, moral education must keep up. Ideological and political courses from primary school to junior high school can no longer be regarded as "auxiliary courses". Otherwise, no matter how talented the people we train are, what’s the use if they have low moral sentiments?