Is it the embodiment of social justice that online public opinion focuses on hot events?

The attention of network public opinion to hot events is not completely the embodiment of social justice.

Yang, an associate researcher at China Academy of Social Sciences, believes that the three words "public opinion", "public opinion" and "public opinion" are frequently used at present, but they are used confusedly and there are many misunderstandings and misuses. Especially for public opinion, people often don't define it, or directly equate public opinion with public opinion, and then equate online public opinion with public opinion; Or equate public opinion with public opinion, and then equate public opinion with public opinion. Online public opinion is not equal to public opinion. Although there are 700 million netizens in China, not everyone is keen to express their opinions, and the content of online communication and discussion is not necessarily open, so there is a great deviation in equating online public opinion with public opinion. Moreover, public opinion is not equal to public opinion. Generally speaking, public opinion is the dominant part of public opinion, but public opinion and public opinion cannot be simply equated. When public opinion grew up, it became more conscious, systematic and stereotyped.

"The requirement of complexity is the top priority of network public opinion field governance." Yu Guoming, a professor at Beijing Normal University, believes that it is necessary to understand the relevance in the ecological mechanism of online public opinion, protect the diversity of public opinion components, and promote the growth and value of online public opinion. He does not advocate that external forces excessively restrict and interfere with public opinion, but expects individuals, collectives and society to grow organically under the action of self-organization mechanism, so that the expression of public opinion is rich and colorful, and "each has its own beauty" and "harmony but difference" in the hedging and compromise of opinions.