Why did Si Manan ask Lenovo six times? What happened to Lenovo?

These days, Si Manan suddenly sent six videos in a row and asked Lenovo six questions. These six questions are:

1,1300 million state-owned assets to Taishan club?

2. Poor temple and rich abbot, L should surpass Evergrande in debt!

I want a brief history of changes in equity.

4. Insolvency L believes that there is a huge thunder risk?

5. I think there are 27 executives, 14 foreigners. Is there any information security problem in government procurement?

6. I want to admit my mistake ...

Several problems stripped the fig leaf of Lenovo Group clean. But strangely, Lenovo has never given a clear answer, and there is no media to reprint these contents. And the reason why he sent six videos in a row to question Lenovo Group, I think it is nothing more than the following purposes.

The first purpose is to win public attention. Si Manan's six questions about Lenovo have not been reprinted by major media, but his behavior directly sent Lenovo to the hot search, and his videos have been played by more and more people. It is said that in just a few days, more than 6,543,800 people clicked to watch his video. Then it was a constant attack, and every question was meaningful, which really attracted many onlookers. I believe that with the continuous fermentation of this incident, more and more media will pay attention to him, which is much easier than unknown reports. This may be his cleverness, and now the influence of the media can not be underestimated.

The second purpose is to attract public attention and supervision. In fact, Lenovo's actions in recent years have indeed been criticized. For example, on the Huawei issue, they directly sided with the United States. I feel that Lenovo Group is no longer a national enterprise as everyone thinks, and Si Manan also mentioned in his shareholding that the employee shareholding of Chinese Academy of Sciences has dropped by 65% from the original 100%. At this time, the shares are changed as follows: Guo Ke Holdings 34%, Lenovo Management 42.5%, Allied Forces 265,438+0.5%. The Chinese Academy of Sciences has lost its position as a major shareholder. Si Manan may hope to draw public attention to the development of Lenovo as a whole from these data. After all, personal supervision is far from public supervision.

The third purpose is to let everyone know Lenovo clearly. Si Manan came in a hurry, but Lenovo didn't reply, so many people who eat melons think that Si Manan's revelation is true and reliable. Someone said directly on the Internet that Lenovo would never be used again, which was a heavy blow to Lenovo's image. Six questions have undoubtedly pushed Lenovo to the forefront, and will also make everyone look at its corporate image and its products more seriously.