What do you think of "daughter-in-law, your sister-in-law is getting married, and I want to use this house to marry her"?

In the early days, perhaps in many areas, many people had the concept of son preference, and because of the influence of this concept, it gradually formed that parents' money was basically passed on to their sons, so daughters could not get any light. That's not true. A woman said that her mother-in-law told herself to give her her sister-in-law's house, because her sister-in-law was getting married, and this house was used as a dowry for her. This woman doesn't know what to do. Personally, I think there is nothing to worry about, because it is her own decision for her mother-in-law to give the house to her daughter.

0 1. My mother-in-law demands respect.

First of all, I want to say that this mother-in-law is still very wise in this matter. It is a great respect for her to choose to come and ask her daughter-in-law.

Of course, from a reasonable point of view, as we all know, sons and daughters are parents' children, and it is natural for parents to give money to any child. However, from the inherent concept of many people, there are indeed many people who think that their parents' money belongs to their sons, so it is inevitable that some sons or daughters-in-law will think that if the mother-in-law gives this money to her sister-in-law, it is equivalent to giving her son's daughter-in-law's money to others.

This mother-in-law is a sensible person, and she understands this truth, so she will choose to ask her daughter-in-law before doing it, in order to avoid any conflicts arising from this matter in the future. And as a daughter-in-law, you should also understand that a mother-in-law can make her daughter-in-law get great respect and sincerely treat her as a family member.

Mother-in-law's money is hers.

Moreover, this woman is still somewhat entangled in this matter. In the final analysis, it is still the influence of inherent concepts. But in fact, we can't always do things with our own inherent ideas, because some reasons don't make sense.

Let's put it this way: the mother-in-law's money was earned by the old couple themselves, and was earned by others through their lifetime's hard work, so the money was in their hands. Even the children of mother-in-law's family cannot fully control their parents' right to spend money. For the mother-in-law, there should be no concept of son preference. After all, the palm of your hand and the back of your hand are all meat, and children should do their best to support their small families.

So this mother-in-law must have bought her son real estate, such as a house and a car, so when her daughter got married, the old man certainly wanted to give her some money. The matter itself is beyond reproach.

On the other hand, even if you stop it, it doesn't make sense. If the mother-in-law really turns over and gives the key directly to her daughter, you are equivalent to a villain in the middle, and you have not gained any benefits.