What did k20pro in Redmi castrate and which groups had a greater impact?

Redmi K20Pro is the first flagship with high cost performance after Redmi's independence. With its ultimate cost performance, it has accumulated a high popularity and attracted many consumers. But according to the tradition of Xiaomi, some functions will definitely be cut off, so let's take stock of what has shrunk:

First, face recognition.

K20Pro is designed with a lifting front camera, which is the first full-screen mobile phone in the whole Xiaomi family and should be commendable. And the use of organic light-emitting diode screen, supporting the seventh generation of screen fingerprint recognition, are perfect. The only fly in the ointment is that it does not support face recognition. There are many mechanical mobile phones that support face recognition, including oppo FINDX and 7Pro. This only needs to be optimized inside the system, and the camera can be moved for identification.

The reason why Redmi K20pro didn't adopt such a scheme is that the lifting adjustment is not mature enough, or the mechanical structure is not enough to support the upgrade lens to be unlocked in a short time (it can be unlocked within 0.5s after adding 7pro, and the pop-up unlocking speed is amazing). Some of the first consumers reported that when someone dialed video or voice on WeChat, the camera popped up (not connected), indicating that the optimization was not perfect. In addition, some people say that the quality of this camera is worrying and the left and right are loose. Redmi's actions are more like protecting the camera.

Second, charge quickly.

Redmi K20Pro has 4000 mAh and supports 27W wired fast charging. It's a pity that it doesn't have a 20W wireless fast charge, but it's understandable. After all, the cost is here, but it comes standard with 18W fast charging. A Snapdragon 855 flagship mobile phone that supports 27W fast charging comes standard with 18W QC3.0 fast charging, and the price starts from 2499 yuan, which is not cheap to tell the truth. Look at IQOO and Meizu 16S. It is really puzzling that the price-performance ratio of Redmi after the price reduction is not low. Is it clearing inventory? Still picking profits?

If consumers want to experience the standard 27W fast charge, they have to spend 49 yuan to buy the 27W fast charge separately, which has to be suspected of bundling. To put it bluntly, it is still a waste of resources (standard 18W cannot be replaced, and it is packed in a box). The charging head of 18W is chicken ribs. Unfortunately, it tastes tasteless, but the cost is not more than a few dollars, so the profit is really as low as tens of dollars. Look at the 44W fast charge supported by IQOO, there is no harm without comparison.

Third, infrared rays.

This is the place where people spit the most after the press conference. It is true that the users of Xiaomi are mainly young people. These people like to toss about all kinds of electronic products. Through infrared remote control, they can remotely control TV, air conditioner and fan. This is really a cool and convenient thing. Although this is not just needed, this small function is still very practical.

The biggest reason for not installing infrared rays is the space of the fuselage. There are 3.5mm headphone holes and lifting cameras on the top of the fuselage, and there is no extra space to install infrared remote control module. The next version may be solved, and the internal layout of the fuselage needs to be redesigned.

Generally speaking, these three slots are not mandatory. The first is that the quality of technology or hardware can't keep up, and the lifting screen is still in the early stage of distribution, which is understandable; The third is the limited space layout of the fuselage, which is understandable. What puzzles me most is the standard 18W fast charge, which is the most likely to clear the inventory, because this kind of coquettish operation started on a thousand yuan machine like Red Rice note7. I think it's a lot of goods

Let's see what Redmi's k2Pro mobile phone castrated. The first is k20 of Redmi, which does not support the whole network. Well, especially many clips are not supported, such as b4, which is probably the two frequency bands of BT screen. In other words, under the same circumstances, the k20Pro mobile phone may have no network or poor signal. Similarly, this phone in Redmi does not support infrared remote control.

However, although he has reduced the configuration, it has little impact on normal use. Everyone should understand the value of value for money. Redmi's Kai 20 can't reach the level of Xiaomi 9, although there are direct small differences in hardware, including software and design, and there are also great differences in materials.

The above is my simple analysis and answer. I hope to have some simple references for your friends who choose red rice mobile phones. Now this mobile phone is very cost-effective, so don't pay too much attention to its rigorous part. Generally speaking, its competitiveness is very strong, and it is a good mobile phone.

Pay attention to spades and share digital information with me.

Redmi brand belongs to the representative of Xiaomi's cost-effective model, and even began to threaten the status of Xiaomi's mobile phone.

Give a practical example:

Different memory versions at the same price, is Xiaomi 9 already feeling the pressure?

Don't worry, no matter how high the cost performance is, the cost still exists. Let's see what Redmi K20Pro castrated!

Redmi K20Pro adopts the front pop-up camera, which solves the problem of realizing the full screen of mobile phone.

At first glance, Redmi K20Pro not only has larger memory than Xiaomi 9, but also has better battery capacity.

So, will it affect Xiaomi 9? Don't worry, look what this phone has castrated!

Redmi K20Pro does not support wireless charging, and the standard charging plug is 18W.

Comparing Xiaomi 9 with Redmi K20Pro, do you think it is still worth buying?

Welcome to leave a message to discuss, like a little attention.

It supports dual cards, but does not support extended memory. Hundreds of mobile phones support it. I kept photos for more than ten years, but I put them on the memory card. I seldom use infrared rays, but when I need them, it's really inconvenient.

I'm sorry! Never used this model of mobile phone!

Not familiar with this mobile phone.

Sorry, I haven't used it, I don't understand it, and I dare not talk nonsense.

I haven't used it. The 360 mobile phone I am using now is quite easy to use, with long standby time and cheap.