What should we do about QQ and 360 War?

Judge for yourself, don't give it away for free, it will be sold and help others count money.

Kaspersky, Rising VS 360

Peer opponents have turned against each other.

Speaking of Jinshan, we can't help but mention the allusions of 360 and "old rivals" Kaspersky and Rising.

In 2002, Kaspersky, a Russian antivirus software, entered China, but it has not been able to effectively develop the market. In July 2006, Kaspersky cooperated with the newly established 360 security department, and the two were bundled into one. 360 security guards provide free services such as killing malware and system diagnosis and repair for netizens, and Kaspersky provides free use of activation codes for half a year. In less than a year, Kaspersky and 360 security guards both entered the top three security products. However, this pair of "good partners" parted ways after they announced their entry into the anti-virus market on July 360, 2008, and Kabbah publicly announced the termination of the cooperative relationship with 360.

20 10 in June, Zhang, managing director of Kaspersky Asia Pacific, published an open letter to Zhou, denouncing Zhou's remarks that "hurt" Kaspersky in recent years and urging him to "turn around". 5438+ 10 In June, Kaspersky said that 360 didn't understand the profession and unscrambled the "super factory" virus at random. 360 announced that it would sue Kaspersky.

Rising and 360' s grievances are similar to those of other antivirus software manufacturers. In July 2007, when Zhou announced that he would launch free antivirus software, Rising's reaction was the most intense. It sent four emails to the media a day, criticizing "360 spoiler", and then the two sides fought over the "manslaughter" incident. Since then, it has never been broken.

Keniu VS 360

The similarity between Fu Sheng and Zhou is * * *.

The role of Ke Niu Company, which appeared in Tencent camp, is quite complicated. Some people say it is the "vest" of Jinshan Company. It is said that the two companies are inextricably linked at the capital level and are merging. However, this news has not been officially confirmed by Jinshan or Keniu Company.

It is also said that because of Fu Sheng, there is a shadow of 360 on the cow.

In March 2006, he became the chairman of Qihoo Company. At that time, 360 security guards were just a small project that was not taken seriously in the company. The whole team is less than 10, led by Fu Sheng. In July, 360 security guards were officially launched, and the growth was gratifying. In March 2008, 360 security guards have become the core business of the company. Zhou spun off 360 from Qihoo and set up an independent company to operate, with Fu Sheng as the general manager of the new company. Fu Sheng should have been accompanying 360 to grow up, but in August 2008, when Zhou announced that he would enter the free anti-virus, Fu Sheng suddenly left. It is said that the two sides have different ideas and lost the motivation to continue cooperation.

After leaving 360, Fu Sheng is gearing up to launch "bovine antivirus" after signing the1August non-competition agreement with 360. Unexpectedly, on the evening of May 25, 360 security guards intercepted the cattle antivirus that had just been released for 5 minutes. This time, Fu Sheng was really angry. He sent a series of questions to Zhou through the Internet, denouncing "cyber hegemony".

Fu Sheng tried to challenge 360 with anti-virus, but was stopped by his 360 classmates. This is reminiscent of 372 1 created by Zhou through 360 security guards. From this perspective, the two are still somewhat similar. 10 year10.29, when Zhou launched "buttoning bodyguards" to keep an eye on QQ, Fu Sheng immediately jumped on it and launched "36 1 special police" to cull 360 security guards.

Baidu VS 360

Make an enemy from 372 1

Baidu publicly stood in Tencent camp this time, of course, not because of its strong relationship with Tencent. Its logic may be more appropriately explained by "the enemy of the enemy is the friend". I'm afraid the feud between Baidu and 360 can be traced back to the "Chinese surfing" in the era of 372 1 and the fierce battle with Baidu in the period of 360' s crackdown on malware. Since then, Zhou and these two industry leaders have become rivals who don't communicate with each other.

Those are old sesame seeds and rotten millet, and now both sides must be fighting for immediate interests-Baidu and 360 are entangled in two lawsuits against each other.

In August this year, on the grounds of copyright infringement and unfair competition, Baidu filed a claim with the court for 6.5438+million yuan from Beijing Qizhi Software, which belongs to 360 security guards. Qizhi Software, where 360 is located, also sued Baidu for "not promoting 360 browser as agreed", and the claim amount was staggering, reaching 54 million yuan. Industry insiders told the National Business Daily that the most fundamental problem in the dispute between Baidu and 360 is not the above-mentioned contract problem, but the threat of 360 expansion, especially its "search" for Baidu's core business.

Love between 360 camp and TX

Shanda VS Tencent, Baidu's battle in the field of game literature

In the war of words triggered by the dispute between 360 and Tencent, Shanda took the lead in showing its position.

/kloc-at the beginning of 0/0, Shanda released an announcement entitled "360 Security Guard Safety Reminder" in its game "Eternal Tower" in official website, saying, "In view of the recent report released by 360 Security Guard, Tencent QQ has the problem of infringing users' privacy. We remind you that please close QQ before entering your account password, paying top-up and having private conversation, so as to ensure the safety of your personal information. "

Shanda is very obvious to Tencent, mainly because since Tencent suddenly surpassed Shanda and took the top spot in its fiery online game industry, Shanda was surpassed by Netease in the second quarter of this year, ranking third and complaining. Seeing that tencent games's market share continued to increase, Shanda continued to decline, and Shanda had to take this opportunity to vent its anger first.

There is also a lot of friction between Shanda and Baidu. Shanda Literature, in particular, has claimed to be "desperate" with Baidu since its birth. At the beginning of this year, Shanda Literature filed a lawsuit against the piracy of Baidu Post Bar. One of the most striking events recently is that Hou Xiaoqiang, CEO of Shanda Literature, challenged Baidu on the Internet. 65438+1October 27th to165438+1October 2nd, Hou Xiaoqiang issued several Weibo articles in succession, angrily accusing Baidu of being responsible for piracy and the decline of domestic cultural and creative industries, and calling on publishing colleagues to jointly sue.

War caused by Sohu VS Tencent input method

Zhang Chaoyang, chairman of Sohu's board of directors, also stood up for 360 at the first time. 10 10/month 1 day, Zhang Chaoyang wrote in his Weibo, "In the internet jungle of China, which lacks effective judicial restraint, we need a check and balance mechanism similar to that existing in nature to limit the evil deeds of monopoly companies to a certain tolerable range. 360' s testing of Tencent is such a check and balance, which makes Tencent know that it can't do whatever it wants. "

The reason why Zhang Chaoyang made such a clear-cut statement is because Tencent and Sohu have fierce competition in portals, online games and input methods.

In June this year, Sohu and Tencent sued each other for unfair competition, and the first case of China input method software came to an end temporarily. Tencent v. Sohu for unfair competition dispute, Sohu lost the case and was awarded 240,000 yuan; Sohu sued Tencent for unfair competition, and Tencent lost the case and compensated 23 1.5 million yuan.

The input method feud between the two sides began in 2009. Sogou said that when Tencent promoted the "QQ Pinyin Input Method", it maliciously induced users to delete sogou Pinyin, which constituted unfair competition. The verdict was "50 boards each", and Zhang Chaoyang couldn't help shouting twice: "A company that is good at plagiarism copied this innovation intact, but now it wants to sue sogou. What a nice face! The thief shouted to catch the thief! " "In the United States, the lightest compensation for plagiarism on such an obvious scale should be more than several hundred million dollars. Therefore, it is a delusion to produce Silicon Valley in China! "

Other VS TX confrontation in various fields.

Cool Dog, Window of the World, Master Lu, Thunder, Fast Broadcast, Storm Video, Duowan, UCWEB, Renren and other companies also automatically joined Tencent's opposition camp. They either invested in Zhou or were "surprised to find the path of their company and very angry" in the "super blacklist" published by 360. Without exception, they fought against Tencent in the fields of players, games, communities and mobile Internet.