Why is the trading margin clause in James' contract more valuable than the trading veto?

Trading veto is the team's highest recognition for NBA players. In the development of NBA for decades, a total of seven players have won the veto power in trading. In particular, after Anthony turned the trading veto into a overlord clause, making it difficult for the Knicks to ride a tiger, the team even dared not trade the veto to the players easily. 17 season, Curry repeatedly asked for the veto power when he renewed his contract, but the Warriors would rather spend more money than agree. 18 season, when the Lakers signed James, they also used this routine, but as compensation, the Lakers added a trading margin clause to James' contract. This clause also made many experts think that James earned it. So, here's the problem. Why is the trading margin clause in James' contract more valuable than the trading veto? Ok, please listen to me and tell me in detail.

Trading margin, also known as return margin, is commonly known as player's designated bonus for trading. Players with trading margin terms can get a salary increase not exceeding 15% of the total remaining contract value when they are traded. This part of the salary increase will be paid year by year according to the player's remaining contract. It is worth mentioning that the amount or proportion of this clause must be clearly written in the contract, otherwise it will be invalid.

In fact, trading the veto means little to James. As far as James's status and influence are concerned, he is a golden cash cow wherever he goes. And judging from his current strength, whoever is willing to trade James will definitely give him a core position. For James, trading the veto is more about saving face. The terms of the trading margin are completely different. Take James this season as an example. During the offseason, James and the Lakers signed a four-year contract of 654.38+59 million. At the end of this season, the total value of James' remaining contract is $654.38 +0. 1.766 million. If James is traded by the Lakers during the offseason, according to the 654.38+0.5% trading margin clause in James' contract, James can get an extra salary of $654.38+0.765 million. To put it simply, the team that took over James must pay James $65,438+$353110,000 for three years.

To sum up, the trading veto is more comprehensive, and the trading margin can not only make the transaction difficult to realize, but also increase James' wealth by17.65 million, which is why the trading margin clause is more valuable than the trading veto.

Trading margin or trading veto, which is more valuable to James? In what view, trading veto is certainly more valuable.

In the summer of 20 18, James joined the Lakers with a contract of four years1570,000 yuan. This time, he has no veto power, but there is a trading deposit of 15% in the contract terms.

Let's explain the trading margin and the trading veto. Generally speaking, trading margin is a clause that increases the difficulty of team trading. If you send a player away during the contract period, you have to pay an extra sum of money to complete the transaction. If it is 65438+ 05% of the remaining contract amount, it is not a small sum. If the Lakers want to send James away, the sooner they send him away, the higher the contract deposit will be. If it was sent away last season, the amount of this deposit will not be too large.

It should be noted that players can unilaterally give up this trading margin. For example, when allen crabbe was traded to the Nets, he gave up the money, so the Blazers sent him away smoothly.

Comparatively speaking, this is a relatively easy-to-get clause. In the entire Lakers, there is one other person besides James who owns this trading margin clause. He is the Pope. It is also a trading margin of 15%. But in comparison, Pope's contract is much smaller than James's. But because of this clause, there are still some troubles when giving away the transaction.

However, trading the veto is a lot of money. Throughout the history of NBA, no more than 10 people can get this clause. Kobe Bryant, Anthony, Garnett, Nowitzki and James are all top brands in the NBA. Trading margin only increases the transaction cost (giving away), but the veto power of trading is likely to be devastating to the team.

For example, Anthony's two deals tortured the home team. In the Knicks, Anthony only wants to go to the Rockets, and the Rockets only want to go back to ryan anderson. As a result, the transaction was delayed until Anthony let go and was willing to go to Thunder. When Thunder arrived, Anthony still had the veto power in the transaction, so Thunder finally found an eagle to buy a house and agreed to buy it out before completing the transaction. This is also a huge loss for Thunder. They accepted the general contract, made Schroeder bigger, sent out the draft pick and sent Anthony away.

Therefore, this time James failed to get the veto, which also shows a problem: James did not do whatever he wanted as he did in the Cavaliers before. The Lakers also fully considered his age. Therefore, not giving James the veto power can also be regarded as protecting the interests of the Lakers. If the Lakers really want to trade James in the future, if there is still this overlord clause, it will be tantamount to choking themselves.

The problem now is that James' contract has only a trading margin clause and no veto power, so the Lakers may send him to any team. In addition, former Rockets coach Jeff Van Gundy said that the Lakers could consider the option of trading James. If the Lakers really use this brain, it is not excluded that James will be sent to a team he doesn't want to go to. In this way, the initiative is completely in the hands of others. Even so, the Lakers will have to pay a lot of money for this.

Therefore, trading margin is more valuable than trading veto, and this judgment is incorrect. For ordinary players, trading margin is extra income, but for a star of James's level, money is far less important than privilege.

Well, it's the first time I heard that the trading veto is more valuable than the trading margin. Almost all players with veto power have trading margin. For example, Popper of the Lakers has both veto power and 15% trading margin; More is only trading margin, without veto power, such as Curry 15%, James J.S.Wong 15%, and even Jeremy Lin has a trading margin of 10% in the Nets contract; Of course, some players can choose to give up these rights when executing the contract. For example, Paul went to the Rockets to give up 15% trading margin, and Anthony went to Thunder to give up trading veto and 15% trading margin!

To put it bluntly, the veto power of trading means that as long as the player says "no", the team must pay the salary to stay, and it is useless to give more money, and the transaction cannot be generated; Trading margin means that as long as the team gives the agreed money, you can get rid of you; At the same time, we have some players who agree to leave, and the team has to pay a sum of money to clinch a deal, otherwise the veto will take precedence!

I always feel that our great James J.S.Wong has been hacked by you mindless people. It's disgusting to blow the stick too much! ! ! There are always some people with ulterior motives who ask some strange questions. They feel that they are raising James J.S.Wong, but it's disgusting! For example, I saw a question the other day, "Can James lead the top Jordan Kobe O 'Neal Duncan to win the championship? "I thought it was really a combination. Did James J.S.Wong bring it? Another time, I saw, "Why do some people say that it is difficult for the Lakers to win the championship without James and Leonard George, the two big five?" "What's the problem? ! These players with overlapping positions play together. How is the configuration? Is the general manager out of his mind? It can be seen that the question that the questioner knows nothing is speechless! ! !

For top paying players, the trading margin is not too binding, but more symbolic to show respect.

Last summer, James signed a four-year contract with the Lakers for $65,438+$54 million. One year after the contract, it is a player option, and the maximum trading margin contained in the contract is $65,438 +0.5%.

Margin for labor agreement transactions:

1. When the team trades players, it needs to pay 15% of the rest of the player's contract (according to the highest).

2. The option in the player's contract does not count.

3. The player's contract surplus+trading deposit, the combination of which shall not exceed the player's maximum salary.

At the end of this season, James' contract remains $65,438+0.10.7 billion. However, since the last year of James' contract is a player's option, if the Lakers trade, he only needs to pay 19-20 season and 20-2 1 season trading deposit (76 million), and the total amount of deposit is about 165438+.

According to the forecast, in the 19-20 season, the league salary cap will be 190,000 US dollars, and the player's top salary (35%) will be 38150,000 US dollars; 20-2 1 season salary cap is $65,438+0.10.8 billion, and the player's top salary (35%) is $465,438 +0.3 million.

James 19-20 earned $37.44 million, and in 2020-2/kloc-0 earned $39.22 million.

Therefore, according to NBA labor rules, if the Lakers trade James in the offseason, James can get a trading margin of about $2.8 million.

Obviously, the $2.8 million trading margin is not binding on the Lakers at all.

Trading veto is to protect the rights and interests of players, that is to say, when a player holds a one-year short-term contract, then the player has the right to have trading veto. During the contract period, the team will not have the right to trade without the consent of the players. Later, it gradually evolved into a superstar's unique right, and it was also a way for the team to express its sincerity to its own stars. In the past ten years, only seven players have had the veto power to trade.

It is not hard to imagine that a star like James also has such rights. In order to compensate James, the Lakers who signed James this season also added the trading margin to the contract terms. Such sincere behavior also made the media experts at that time think that James was really caught! So why is the "trading margin" clause in James' contract more valuable than the "trading veto"? The above has introduced the trading veto for everyone, so now let's learn about the trading margin!

The trading margin in the NBA contract is also called "transfer margin" and "trading bonus". According to the understanding of our fans, the popular meaning is loyalty bonus! Refers to the "usual trick" that the team will use when being a star or recruiting big-name stars. To show sincerity, invite them to join their own team. Simply put, it is to shout at the stars, "You are very important to us! We need you, you will play an important role in the team! If we trade you, you will get another amount of compensation! "

So now that we know the "trading veto" and "trading margin", let's talk about the contract signed by James and the Los Angeles Lakers. According to the news, this is a four-year contract of $654.38+59 million, in which the fourth year is a player option! In addition, this four-year contract includes what we call 15% trading margin. Trading margin means that when the team trades you, you can get a certain percentage of the remaining salary or a fixed amount.

Then it is clear that we calculate according to James' four-year contract of 65.438+0.59 billion. At the end of this season, the total contract value of James is $65,438 +0 1766. If James is traded by the Los Angeles Lakers this summer, according to the calculation of 15% of James' trading margin, it will be 1765 USD. Then if you take over James' team in the future, you must pay James' salary, 65438+353 1 000 dollars for three years. Therefore, only superstars are eligible for such treatment! Obviously, the trading margin will be more valuable than the trading veto in this contract! What do you think of this? Welcome everyone to discuss together.

Some time ago, Jenny Bass's remarks that she had considered trading James caused a heated discussion among netizens, but behind this incident, some details about the contract signed between James and the Lakers were once again put in front of fans, and the contract contained a trading deposit of 15%.

Then why doesn't James have the veto power to trade? You know, if a player has veto power in the transaction, he will undoubtedly have an advantage.

However, judging from the provisions of this clause, the trading margin is similar to the trading veto. Trading veto means that the player has one vote in the transaction, and the trading margin is a clause to ensure the interests of the player. When the team trades players, the players can get extra compensation. It should be noted that the trading margin is between 5%- 15%.

If the trading margin is more valuable than the trading veto, it is that the trading veto is of little value to players like Lao Zhan, because as the first player in the league, James' strength and influence are beyond doubt. If you have to trade him, his value will be very great, and most teams in the league will spare no effort to get him. His strong ability to absorb gold is also liked by the team. With James, there is a guarantee of tickets. How can the team have money? So James should be confident that the Lakers won't trade him.

James' trading margin is 15%, so when the Lakers want to trade him, they will pay him back. For James, it is not as direct as using money to trade veto power. Because at James' level, something substantive is more important. Therefore, from this analysis, it can be said that trading margin is more valuable than trading veto.

I also mentioned the scope of the deposit above, James' maximum 15%, and combined with James' annual salary, if he gets the deposit, it will be a lot of money. And judging from the long contract signed by James, he wanted to "die" in the Lakers, so he didn't consider being traded.

James signed a four-year contract with the Lakers with a salary of $654.38+53 million. The salaries in the four seasons are 35.65 million, 37.44 million, 39.22 million and 465.43.8+0 million respectively.

However, it is worth noting that the salary of this season in the player option is not included in the trading margin.

But I think players are more domineering in trading the veto, but it may be other reasons why the Lakers didn't exchange the veto for James, or they became cautious after thinking of Anthony and Knicks' farce.