The first trial lasted five and a half years, and the second trial progressed slowly. What happened?

The judgment of the first instance was sentenced to five and a half years, and the second instance was postponed, which may be due to the following reasons: after the judgment of the first instance, the criminal suspect appealed, thinking that the evidence was insufficient or the procedure was illegal, and submitted the reasons for appeal and the evidence favorable to him. In the second trial, the evidence he provided was cross-examined and defended, and the judge adopted the evidence of the other side, and then made a suspended sentence according to the seriousness of the case. The above is all my reply, I hope I can help you and wish you a happy life ~