What are the students told to review when they browse the yellow net?

The staff of the school's academic affairs department responded that this content was not sent, and this incident belongs to fraud.

The content and focus of the controversy mainly lies in that students use the campus network to browse such websites, but the results are collected by information, and their privacy is completely exposed to others. Obviously, this is an invasion of personal privacy.

Personal privacy is protected by law, and it is illegal to invade privacy. Especially in such a sensitive place as school, college students pay more attention to their privacy. So after this incident came out, it instantly detonated the network.

However, judging from the content of the short message, it is impossible for ordinary students to edit such a short message with strict structure and complete information, involving time, times, school rules, classroom number, lecture content and so on. If it is really done by students, it will take a lot of energy to edit such a short message. What's more, it is full of "official" flavor from the aspects of text format, text style and tone.

Ordinary pranks, will they be so rigorous? This is really questionable. As for the school's response, in the case of anonymous evidence, it is impossible to clear the suspect. Because this happened, it is not the school's denial that can clear the suspect.