Regular season MVP or finals MVP, which contains more gold?

Regular season MVP and finals MVP are both high in gold. But after careful comparison, the gold content of MVP is still greater than that of f MVP.

The highlight performance that lasts for a whole season is more difficult than the series. There are 82 games in a season, and the whole front line lasts for half a year from June 65438+ 10 to April next year. Not only must there be continuous highlights, but also records, and more importantly, there must be extraordinary physical strength and figure. Too many stars have been disqualified from competing for MVP because of insufficient games. Although FMVP is difficult and valuable, it is not as difficult as MVP in terms of time span. Looking at the winners of the two honors in the past 20 years, we will find some interesting phenomena.

From this MVP form, it is not difficult to find that all the winners were the first-line superstars at that time, and the lowest one can also rank in the top five of the league.

Although this FMVP form is also Starlight Glimmer, it is obvious that several winners were not the top stars in the league at that time, and some even failed to rank in the top 20 of the league. This shows that FMVP is accidental. So on the whole, the gold content of MVP is higher.

The gold content of MVP in regular season is definitely higher than that in finals. The former is an assessment of the performance of superstars throughout the year, while the latter is limited to the finals series, with greater variables and subjective influence.

Counting all previous naismith Basketball Hall of Fame players, the regular season MVP can almost be regarded as a stepping stone. Up to now, including all active players, players who have won the MVP in the regular season, but may eventually miss the Hall of Fame, I am afraid Ross is the only one who broke his wing early. In contrast, the finals produced too many lucky people and will.

For a long time, the controversy about finals MVP can be roughly summarized into two points. First, the gap between the two candidates is very small. In the 2004 finals, Pistons beat Zijin Army 4-/kloc-0-,and Billups and Ben Wallace also contributed. But in the end, david stern awarded the MVP trophy to Billups, making him a grassroots MVP at that time. In 2008, the Big Three of the "Green Shirts" defeated the Lakers led by Kobe Bryant 4-2, and the data and role of Pierce and Garnett were similar. But The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King helped Pierce win the Golden Cup.

Second, it is the element of luck. In the 2007 finals, the West was strong and the East was weak, and the Spurs swept the "First Brother" Cavaliers 4-0. The one-sided game made Parker whip up the whip, not Duncan. There is also a 20 15 final. Iguodala won the MVP trophy as Indiana Jones, which also reflects the uncontrollable nature of the award.

In contrast, the MVP in the regular season needs superstars to perform phenomenally against 29 other teams in the league, and the performance of some focus battles will be magnified. It can be seen that the gold content of regular season MVP is much greater than that of finals MVP. (Wen h)

This can't be generalized, but generally speaking, the regular season mvp must be the best player in this season, not the finals mvp. Some players were born for big scenes, won the championship with the team under certain conditions, and won the finals MVP because of their outstanding performance in the finals, which is somewhat opportunistic. The specific analysis is as follows.

Regular season MVP needs to play at the top level in 82 regular season games, at the same time lead the team to the forefront of the leaderboard, and also play impressive dominance games in some games;

The finals MVP only needs to perform well in four to seven games (three wins in seven games) in the finals, and sometimes only needs to perform well in two or three games. Generally appear in the champion team, not necessarily the player with the best data. For example, Iguodala, the MVP of the 20 15 NBA Finals, is only a role player of the Warriors, not a big-name star, and the data is not particularly prominent. Therefore, the regular season MVP has higher gold content.

As the highest honor hall of world basketball, NBA is unique in terms of player strength, wonderful games, commercial operation and so on, and is also very domineering in trophy design. Unlike our previous MVP trophy, it is like a fruit bowl.

When it comes to the contest between MVP and finals MVP, Jerry West, an ancient superstar symbol, Black Mamba Kobe, a recently retired superstar, and Stephen Curry, an active superstar, will always be three roles that cannot be bypassed. It can be said that the contest between MVP and FMVP has a lot to do with them.

MVP and FMVP are both representative awards, and it's really hard to say who can win these two trophies. Kobe has only one MVP, but can you say that his post is lower than James's? As a pioneer in the era of small ball, Curry had two MVPs, but returned empty-handed on FMVP, but you can't deny Curry's greatness and influence. The tragic hero West is the only defeated FMVP in history. His strength conquered his opponents and allies. It varies from person to person, and it is really hard to say which is more adequate. Personally, I prefer FMVP.

MVP represents a player's personal peak season, which not only has super personal strength, but also has very good stability and good physical support. There are 82 games in the regular season and a four-month schedule, in which the confrontation and loss can be imagined. The average player can't get good data at all and it lasts for a long time. It can be said that this is the patent of a superstar. In addition, there must be a very high record bonus to prove the outstanding ability of the leadership team and a good relationship with the media. The mvp vote is largely related to the media, and James has done a good job in leading the team and the media. This also made him successfully get four MVPs, and Kobe Bryant had a hard time renting on the road of MVP because of the media and Eagle County incident, but there was only one MVP in his 20-year career.

Getting the MVP doesn't necessarily mean winning the championship, but getting the FMVP means everyone wins the championship except West. Moreover, FMVP is mostly the product of the team's core, and the weight of the championship is higher than any award. You can ask Buckley and Malone for MVP or championship. After James joined the Heat, Kobe sent him a text message. "Go ahead, pursue the next MVP, but we will win the championship." And Jordan mocked Miles, the general manager of Warriors. What about 73 liters? No champion is nothing. This is the attraction of FMVP and the championship.

Of course there are exceptions. Shao Wei averaged three pairs per game, but only ranked sixth in the West, but he beat Harden to win the MVP, but who knew there were more emotional factors? More is the affirmation of Shao Wei's persistence. When FMVP was given to Iguodala, Curry's full face of questions was also speculated to be a contest between sponsors. Now Durant has snatched two FMVPs from Curry, and Curry has not lost his eyes and made everyone feel distressed. Can he still win the FMVP trophy?

In the same way, there is no shortage of old rogue Jordan, and so is honor.

Thank you for inviting me. Speaking of gold content, we can first compare the number and quantity of winners of MVP and f MVP:

Up to now, the NBA has awarded MVP 7 1 time, with a total of ***38 awards, 1 time with 23 awards, 2 awards with 6 awards and 3 or more awards with 9 awards. Two or more consecutive MVP winners * * * 1 1: Russell, Chamberlain, Jabbar, Bird, moses malone, Johnson, Jordan, Duncan, Nash, James and Curry.

Let's look at the 48-time award-winning FMVP, ***30 people won, 20 people won 1 time, 5 people won twice, 5 people won more than 3 times, and 5 people won more than 2 times in a row: Jordan, Dream, O 'Neill, Kobe Bryant and James.

MVP is more about the recognition of a player's stable state throughout the season, while FMVP is basically the ultimate winner in the more intense finals. Through the comparison of the above data, on the whole, we can't deny the opportunity to get FMVP once, but it is more difficult to get it continuously than MVP. Therefore, personally, the gold content of continuously obtaining FMVP is higher than that of continuously obtaining MVP, and the gold content of once obtaining FMVP is even worse than that of a single MVP.

This depends on how to say it.

Chamberlain Russell Bird, champion of FMVP Sanlian Village, Jordan O 'Neill. Jordan took it twice.

Jordan's MVP was snatched away by Buckley and karl malone after he scored the MVP for three times in a row, but Jordan immediately nailed these two miserable MVPs to the crown-less position with two 4:2 and two rounds of classic finals. Do you think MVP is better or FMVP is better?

MVP is an important individual award, but the temptation behind it is far less than FMVP, because FMVP means that the team reached the finals and won the championship. Of course there are exceptions. For example, West is a loser when he steals someone else's FMVP, but this phenomenon is unique. After all, there are not many players who are as handsome as West and play the ball so well.

MVP provides opportunities for those who can't win the championship as a whole, but the players have superior personal strength. Like Westbrook, Harden and Durant. I purposely pulled Thunder Sanshao out, because their MVP really proved their super strength, but Shao Wei and Harden probably won't win the championship. Why don't we change a few FMVPs together and share the championship?

So, if this gold content is money gold, that fool will choose FMVP. Because the finals are proof of the team's strength. A typical example is the piston, which won the championship three times since the 1980 s because of its overall strength. Du Masi Thomas and someone got FMVP respectively. The regular season MVP has nothing to do with them. But who can say that the Pistons are not an admirable team?

All bosses like such a team. As long as it is well managed, it can continue its position as a strong team for a long time.

Regular season MVP has higher gold content.

The gold content here refers to the player's play.

Why?

There are 82 games in the regular season and up to 7 games in the finals. It's that simple.

The efficiency of 82 games is inevitably much more difficult than that of 7 games.

However, for top NBA stars, perhaps they care more about an FMVP.

Why?

Because it means winning the championship, which is the most important thing.

In 2007, MVP Nowitzki performed impeccably in the regular season. The playoffs were blacked out by Golden State, leaving a frustrated figure.

20 1 1, Nowitzki led the Mavericks all the way to the finals and won the finals FMVP six times with unparalleled performance.

Which seems more successful and important?

Think about Buckley, every time he opens his mouth, how others refute him.

"A person without a championship is not qualified to judge me."

Ordinary players need an MVP to prove that they are top players, and top players may prefer an FMVP to prove that they have won the championship.

MVP means that you are the best player in the league, and your leading performance is excellent.

First of all, conclusion: I think regular season MVP is more valuable than finals MVP.

MVP is the most valuable player in the regular season, and it is usually the core of the team with the best performance in a season, such as Brother Alphabet last season, or a team that has made great progress compared with last season, such as Ross in those days, and historical personal data, which are favored by voters, such as Shao Wei with triple doubles.

FMVP is the most valuable player in the finals, usually won by the best player in the team that won the finals, that is to say, the best player in the championship team during the finals, such as leonard in 20 14 and Iguodala in 20 15. They may not be the best players in that team, but they are outstanding players who won those four games. Only once in history has the MVP in the finals been won by the loser, and that is Jerry West, LOGO man.

First of all, MVP looks at the performance of a team in 82 games throughout the season. Core players need to maintain a stable performance throughout the season and lead the team to achieve excellent records in order to win the MVP. FMVP looks at the performance of seven games, even the performance of a player in four key wins, and does not consider the contribution of the entire playoff players.

Secondly, the winning team is sometimes not the team with the best record in the regular season, and the MVP in the regular season is more likely to give it to the team with the best record in the regular season. In the final of the top seven, sometimes the best team may not win, and sometimes luck is also an important factor. For example, in the 20 19 finals, if Durant and Thompson were not injured, it is unknown whether the Raptors can win the championship, and whether Leonard can win FMVP is also unknown.

There are many players with MVP but no FMVP, such as Malone, Buckley, Nash and Curry. There are also many players who have FMVP but have never won MVP, such as Wade, leonard and Iguodala, such as Poos and Pierce.

In the same season, only ten people won MVP and FMVP at the same time, * * * completed 15 times. They are willis reed (1970), Jabbar (197 1), moses malone (1983), Magic Johnson (1987) and Olajuwon (1993). Only three people can do it many times, namely Bird (1984, 1986), James (20 12, 20 13), and finally Michael Jordan (19 1.

So I think MVP is more valuable than FMVP.

Most NBA players are at their peak for only a few years. They must give full play to all their talents in this limited time, so as to win a considerable contract for themselves. Winning all kinds of awards and breaking all kinds of records are also helpful to improve self-worth, so players will fight for those few awards every year. After playing 82 regular-season games in a season, there are only a handful of real winners, so which award can best reflect the strength? Let's discuss it together today.

To say that the scoring champion who embodies personal strength is definitely one of them, all the stars sought after by fans in NBA have first-class scoring ability, and the strongest attack is always the most attractive. However, the scoring champion also has his shortcomings. Meanwhile, the team's record is likely to be affected. The magical McGrady is a good example. I am in high spirits to win the scoring champion, but the record of this team is too bad. No wonder so many people were unconvinced when he entered the Hall of Fame.

What if he is the best defensive player? To get the best defensive player, his defense must be the first in the league, but it also depends on the team system. Duncan's defense belongs to the historical level, and his career average of 2.2 blocks is a good explanation, but Duncan has never won a DPYO in his career, which is a great pity. On the contrary, Green of the Warriors can win the best defensive player. His data, whether it's stealing or blocking, is not top-notch. His advantage lies in this warrior system. In this system, Rigling has become an indispensable defensive point. If it were another team, Green would never be so eye-catching.

So the ultimate goal of each player, the championship, can prove this person's strength? Of course not. In the history of NBA, there are too many people who "lie down and hold" the championship. The champion has nothing to do with him. James jones of the Cavaliers is a good example. Besides strength, luck is really important to win the championship. When McGrady saw that the championship was just around the corner, ray allen snatched it away by three points. Let's just say it's bad luck.

So what honor is the ultimate embodiment of personal strength? In my opinion, MVP is the award with the highest gold content. First of all, if you want to win the MVP, your personal data must be excellent, and your score must be 10 before the league. As for other data, you must also be ahead of the league. The most important thing is that the team's record is still good, with a lot of data, but few players can come up with data to bring the team's record together. This is also why there will be no MVP in the team that "holds the group". Generally, MVP will be born in a relatively weak team, because his personal importance is irreplaceable, and no one can move forward without the group.

It was James who brought this ability into full play, especially in the 2008-2009 season, when he led the Cavaliers with only big Z and Xiao Mo, and created the first record in the league with 66 wins 16 losses. James also averaged 28.4 points, 7.6 rebounds and 7.2 assists 1.7 steals 1 blocks. He brought his personal ability to the extreme and the team's record to the peak. That season was also James' first MVP season. It may be impossible for Jordan to lead a group of CBA teammates to play such a record efficiently.

So from this perspective, the best way to show personal strength is to get the MVP. There is no luck in this, but you must have real skills to get it. Although James is 33 years old, he still has a chance to win the MVP of the new season. If he can still win the MVP with the lineup of "Death Five Old", then "Sunspot" should shut up!

Generally speaking, the gold content of finals MVP is higher than that of regular season MVP. There is a simple reason. For players, the champion is the most valuable. In the NBA, the finals MVP is equivalent to the champion-there is only one exception in NBA history, which is also the first season of FMVP. In the 1968-69 season, the league awarded this award to the loser of the finals, Lakers guard Jerry West. In the finals with Celtic that year, West averaged 37.9 points and led the team into the deciding game. Scored 42 points 13 rebounds 12 assists in the seventh game.

The gold content of the finals MVP exceeds that of the regular season MVP, which is most easily reflected in the historical ranking of players. When the professional data of two players are similar to other achievements, if one has the honor of finals MVP and the other is regular season MVP, then the one with finals MVP honor will definitely rank higher-the champion will always be the most competitive hard currency.

In addition, compared with the finals MVP, the regular season MVP will become an embarrassment at some point. In 2007, Nowitzki became the MVP of the regular season with his perfect personal performance, but before receiving the award, his team was "black eight" by the Warriors in the first round of the Western Conference playoffs. As a loser, Nowitzki's mood can be imagined.

Of course, this possibility exists if the gold content of MVP in a regular season exceeds the gold content of MVP trophy in the finals of that year. For example, in the 20 14- 15 season, Stephen Curry was the MVP in the regular season and Andre Iguodala was the MVP in the finals. In the regular season, Curry averaged 23.8 points and 7.7 assists per game, leading the Warriors to 67 wins and becoming the champion of the regular season. Iguodala averaged only 12. 1 points, 5 rebounds and 3. 1 assists 1.0 steals in the finals that year. Iguodala was elected only because the performance of other warriors was flawed, and FMVP was given to the winner, so he became a lucky one.